1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
|
Return-Path: <pete@petertodd.org>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ADAB5BD4
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 2 Feb 2016 17:07:58 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from outmail149082.authsmtp.co.uk (outmail149082.authsmtp.co.uk
[62.13.149.82])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 050DE19D
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 2 Feb 2016 17:07:57 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-c247.authsmtp.com (mail-c247.authsmtp.com [62.13.128.247])
by punt20.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/) with ESMTP id u12H7uYg020020;
Tue, 2 Feb 2016 17:07:56 GMT
Received: from petertodd.org (ec2-52-5-185-120.compute-1.amazonaws.com
[52.5.185.120]) (authenticated bits=0)
by mail.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/) with ESMTP id u12H7sPL005478
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO);
Tue, 2 Feb 2016 17:07:55 GMT
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by petertodd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6272540185;
Tue, 2 Feb 2016 17:04:44 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2016 12:07:52 -0500
From: Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org>
To: Toby Padilla <tobypadilla@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20160202170752.GD18604@muck>
References: <CAGcHOzzde_T3xJwJL2Ehyw7U1FgxEEBJR30VBLdSZMj=W49hSg@mail.gmail.com>
<201601260224.16917.luke@dashjr.org>
<CAGcHOzziBsF6DhX=TrgDJdYiOLHT-zwwX3FAUUkvfi1_4OmPKw@mail.gmail.com>
<n880a6$i5v$1@ger.gmane.org>
<CAGcHOzyQ4d_oPey=7bMcm8mA4QWAcBrkCu3CY=_BVjrbbd03Sw@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Xm/fll+QQv+hsKip"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAGcHOzyQ4d_oPey=7bMcm8mA4QWAcBrkCu3CY=_BVjrbbd03Sw@mail.gmail.com>
X-Server-Quench: 804c2a9d-c9cf-11e5-bcde-0015176ca198
X-AuthReport-Spam: If SPAM / abuse - report it at:
http://www.authsmtp.com/abuse
X-AuthRoute: OCd2Yg0TA1ZNQRgX IjsJECJaVQIpKltL GxAVKBZePFsRUQkR
aAdMdgAUHlAWAgsB AmAbWlNeUFp7XGY7 bghPaBtcak9QXgdq
T0pMXVMcUQRqeRtC ZmIeUhx2cA0IfX15 bQhqXnQIXhVzIVsu
Sx0CCGwHMGJ9OjNL BV1YdwJRcQRMLU5E Y1gxNiYHcQ5VPz4z
GA41ejw8IwAXGw50 ekkhN1scXXNDNzo4 QA9KDzg1GgUbTiEu
IlQBEmkmMXosCGN6 MF1pYVsJNhIUFm8W J1tKHChSIF1p
X-Authentic-SMTP: 61633532353630.1038:706
X-AuthFastPath: 0 (Was 255)
X-AuthSMTP-Origin: 52.5.185.120/25
X-AuthVirus-Status: No virus detected - but ensure you scan with your own
anti-virus system.
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Cc: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] [BIP Draft] Allow zero value OP_RETURN in Payment
Protocol
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2016 17:07:59 -0000
--Xm/fll+QQv+hsKip
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 09:41:01AM -0800, Toby Padilla via bitcoin-dev wrot=
e:
> The wording is a little strange and I think it *should* work as you state,
> but Bitcoin Core will actually reject any output that has zero value (even
> a single OP_RETURN output -- I just tested again to make sure).
>=20
> Here's the blocking code:
>=20
> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/src/qt/paymentserver.cpp#L=
584
>=20
> I agree that this should be made more clear in my BIP though, I'll clean =
up
> the language.
Note that because the dust limit is ignored completely for OP_RETURN
outputs, you can work around this by setting the OP_RETURN outputs to 1
satoshi instead.
--=20
https://petertodd.org 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
000000000000000008320874843f282f554aa2436290642fcfa81e5a01d78698
--Xm/fll+QQv+hsKip
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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==
=rb7s
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--Xm/fll+QQv+hsKip--
|
