summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/02/1d11cbefcfaea28dcd2eabef7ac93a0be63efd
blob: 00bd69ecb6c142a5f073ff71591d221f613f3786 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
Return-Path: <hearn@vinumeris.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
	[172.17.192.35])
	by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C0418258
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Fri, 23 Oct 2015 11:30:24 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-ig0-f174.google.com (mail-ig0-f174.google.com
	[209.85.213.174])
	by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EACDC17A
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Fri, 23 Oct 2015 11:30:22 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by igdg1 with SMTP id g1so14123721igd.1
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Fri, 23 Oct 2015 04:30:22 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=vinumeris.com; s=google;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:cc:content-type;
	bh=IbP/rHflprMzS/H+jf9sAMoxqFj4n9GbOomZhyq5DbM=;
	b=Jr0BxP89B4uS7Grzz/bDsBF8vEJeZt1y5GLtTZKER6Y8VmXb1fEqmzjNt+MNMTVAOq
	QHJjdLbuCkU/SDSj3a32PqM+w27mSTcmVA+Ytksbz4Qht+1fXTuJw0LQHkZHNIzD3jnf
	xpGuRRT0Mgcj/AUN++8HCLyOTsm1m9AvzM8gA=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
	h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
	:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type;
	bh=IbP/rHflprMzS/H+jf9sAMoxqFj4n9GbOomZhyq5DbM=;
	b=iyio3Sj6oNraKdPhtgcAo5dRHwQpxwVy3v3I+bYM/Jkrxa1iq+Mf8AxLKNLmmyZ2rz
	nMncvf8EeGoMfdZLBs8HfvP1PIBKUznFANZgXyYCuG8a8m74Q6W1CNRvOU7f6ozjMbr6
	fJUVyPxcL71Vw4AiQ5+ogHsbkKLiUeO9CENfd0LAphYecYKoP+N5vv5oJGIVhRGMMQLs
	bCcz5Tu53BW9GKlR5f7/+IQZ1lR6a8YsccbQTx7Xgjv5LcBTxLWKK80NSXN/tr4NG+/1
	qvwPwe6jfo5PuVWOKbOC7QWnhdtEcMm1CtT4NA8hhQ5beVyOU4IuAFJv2aVQ728eLeJi
	pzyw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQleFAn1xxXNvHURH/9/sJ158zZREoRSfvlkuRF/Y9hlRmg7QnZw4ART+recdFASqJpYbqJx
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.131.229 with SMTP id op5mr3750315igb.83.1445599822352;
	Fri, 23 Oct 2015 04:30:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.50.123.166 with HTTP; Fri, 23 Oct 2015 04:30:22 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <878u6velnc.fsf@rustcorp.com.au>
References: <878u6velnc.fsf@rustcorp.com.au>
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2015 13:30:22 +0200
Message-ID: <CA+w+GKSo75Y3bum+NOVjvaSiqyAozirg=PUrF-3ACg5GRXcp2w@mail.gmail.com>
From: Mike Hearn <hearn@vinumeris.com>
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b3a9bc0e632fa0522c3ef80
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham
	version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
	smtp1.linux-foundation.org
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 23 Oct 2015 12:18:30 +0000
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Mailing List Moderation Now Active.
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2015 11:30:24 -0000

--047d7b3a9bc0e632fa0522c3ef80
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

>
>     - Posts must concern the near-term development of the bitcoin core
>       code or bitcoin protocol.
>

Are block size discussions considered acceptable, then?

--047d7b3a9bc0e632fa0522c3ef80
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><div class=3D"gmail_quote"><blo=
ckquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #c=
cc solid;padding-left:1ex">=C2=A0 =C2=A0 - Posts must concern the near-term=
 development of the bitcoin core<br>
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 code or bitcoin protocol.<br></blockquote><div><br></d=
iv><div>Are block size discussions considered acceptable, then?</div></div>=
</div></div>

--047d7b3a9bc0e632fa0522c3ef80--