1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
|
Return-Path: <gmaxwell@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6CA66C8A;
Tue, 3 Jul 2018 23:45:25 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-vk0-f67.google.com (mail-vk0-f67.google.com
[209.85.213.67])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 53B0A764;
Tue, 3 Jul 2018 23:45:24 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-vk0-f67.google.com with SMTP id 125-v6so2096495vke.11;
Tue, 03 Jul 2018 16:45:24 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id
:subject:to:cc;
bh=5XoX9VLnCNHvq5Y1uhdSeT2FdzZfmHoSkO/zUIeNz8g=;
b=HvdQBsH0pmmsKpNxjWzT5R2QTM6oxnGtmAyV56TBdCBwwCHwGfT94268O5LnN87bNH
t59uHrQzJfIgrsEQogMmYi8qPJSredpefX/QwxjSUMEsQdb6N8LT4BBMUhnWs58D9Lbj
3GWKERa81/lFC/0TixXY23W6agoQeOokb1UuX1/FgyCSRwxpv8Uz5lQ/MIC8xBBHTqaf
Jf3ttB32ZfVSx1dpD5ugZXaK1gVQFK6g5g6YCNyDk29seZ1Rvyx+tuZtWkPLUjVssw1I
yxS3N8AU1M5Y9i3lyl9NOpbnQ4LzZb3llV8p+DEddZzK0KGGwCN7Jbb++YUDo5QuN2+G
gcPw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from
:date:message-id:subject:to:cc;
bh=5XoX9VLnCNHvq5Y1uhdSeT2FdzZfmHoSkO/zUIeNz8g=;
b=fFDfne+AF8Gi6pVfxQa4mfPmckL11ufILRHOq9xX3IGn44tF6lztG+uPA/ZeDEIypF
vLu6EjPRJyUAX7+ETunEdcviKfZjhmlSLQEdV+/Nk6SDV8tbkT8qiKtLbAUciK1MdZJ3
87ZllosraajJgKtgltZal2+7MTDgtjrXIK4dwI7PAnUIoL43X6iIvlStRP/4tPl/MP+8
1ol119zWSxesnstE2veVys2Pac/+gInQn1V1I63DR0r8R9sLD+sLBAee70oXVZPBV029
oE9ZhcHjFuiM9BlUt+tlunK2wDx8THD9rw0YFsTyUFG0ZUM/0rD8bQmdAWe7uKqllXHC
79qQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APt69E3WnTFk3ZhTtvwafOiCDHHPihR/V/CG4d75WMMF/vhoyQbGGnba
N/xo7uTdHfrPn0dWPiLaOrqH35ckFHlE71aTLjE=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AAOMgpcDhGUhBsvgLFzheubmMBmqZb/dg/8oG0ofdLjkd1Vqopdpra3j6n0GK2QIxfXa7SnJBTWmNa4FDTYq53igCTY=
X-Received: by 2002:a1f:d786:: with SMTP id
o128-v6mr18516913vkg.116.1530661523444;
Tue, 03 Jul 2018 16:45:23 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: gmaxwell@gmail.com
Received: by 2002:a67:51c9:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP;
Tue, 3 Jul 2018 16:45:22 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20180703052100.gtjdverh5irfokrp@petertodd.org>
References: <871sewirni.fsf@gmail.com>
<CAAS2fgS-_D7aBcDf_nAbuREBxv65zYMr60-1YqCnx-esvRVfEg@mail.gmail.com>
<87y3esvrvu.fsf@rustcorp.com.au>
<20180703052100.gtjdverh5irfokrp@petertodd.org>
From: Gregory Maxwell <greg@xiph.org>
Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2018 23:45:22 +0000
X-Google-Sender-Auth: w09UwT5pzBKaSCS8HQeVlRaeLrg
Message-ID: <CAAS2fgTUHFpzW54A2_johHVfa=bwdo3CpG2or5Z1Qg4hC-B+rA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
DKIM_VALID, FREEMAIL_FROM,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Cc: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>,
lightning-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP sighash_noinput
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2018 23:45:25 -0000
On Tue, Jul 3, 2018 at 5:21 AM, Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org> wrote:
> The problem with that name is `SIGHASH_REUSE_VULNERABLE` tells you nothing
> about what the flag actually does.
I believe that making the signature replayable is 1:1 with omitting
the identification of the specific coin being spent from it.
|
