1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
|
Return-Path: <jim.posen@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CC988D56
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 13 Apr 2018 22:15:51 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-it0-f53.google.com (mail-it0-f53.google.com
[209.85.214.53])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4E9E5165
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 13 Apr 2018 22:15:51 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-it0-f53.google.com with SMTP id t192-v6so6441446itc.1
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 13 Apr 2018 15:15:51 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
:cc; bh=ezz6j8XcMcZ9SodNeUnv1St7iH9eDOAtF38b/WRzrgs=;
b=oeVrE2GcNewyIVlnVo9Do7B92wfXizNRjdLGXsm95XDihtX5vKsYGLnxIsvrslSq77
CmnFWKQm3/3vh6oiVhOrrM8OouhiIyTYqKYFxjqJjZZc8BrNoYqctjtrIV2boNR2up65
mUQdrLL3E4AQB1u8B9LKftLa3xYSXenD/KOy/4oT/pzPnNgUMYw+THlAO5+3lqT7p72O
QZyiFhAd2dfql+HHpuk0JbAtBE696xSJNit65obdIK3qp5Tp7clPuLZpBfEm3QyEqPWm
TZ8XNk9SaIlZ3N8Us1zH68xA4gOLN5c3pO+6r2x0HXydstD9GIXxVfquTw1ryXTe+2dE
NHDw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
:message-id:subject:to:cc;
bh=ezz6j8XcMcZ9SodNeUnv1St7iH9eDOAtF38b/WRzrgs=;
b=Lofm3fMKY/ghGyG0XOxYRdPAGD7HV11NvDQtA/mIka0XhpUnxm6NsKjO/o5iTVAKww
rraHd3sFhIlz/b0qVbOZU1FuiipZ17tNMsa/8D4KJppbHoidFRCubujqCnJEP0Hvi1WC
fW8mikuinaCgdbxtwPWKymmR4xOPOhGcnfNjvoFTEChSzMEgz3GVZvk+farDaqK5S+5j
5QK66J6iP5xWeacHvFs80EfJdys2KlA75A0GpYt6/I526NiQ0OqHNCI8K2lGSeex9YW3
iKvXzzdumOfzjrLo6+IXaqGoKGnIkoqorbJbJJ610nzGS5cXIgIlrBA0kWEeXWJnj99h
9EJw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALQs6tBy60cloeCDT7+Q4MoI/pD0leiuCh0y5Cb1Ngicy1GOWc2fOwop
QVlA4lNlDGl2Mo1zNFmyaaEyHSgHbcKc5NkMslIYCw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx4/WVC7S3BVizYzSHSawbfsIP3ieYsYrmZQsKXlQHeyTmLpWGKsTgus7UzJvO0dZISlJ42XIiJqE+XpgwmNk658=
X-Received: by 2002:a24:5b06:: with SMTP id g6-v6mr7145756itb.43.1523657750511;
Fri, 13 Apr 2018 15:15:50 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.107.52.80 with HTTP; Fri, 13 Apr 2018 15:15:50 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4A0CD31A-8745-4425-99FC-5DF12FA3B917@jonasschnelli.ch>
References: <paqids$e14$1@blaine.gmane.org>
<4A0CD31A-8745-4425-99FC-5DF12FA3B917@jonasschnelli.ch>
From: Jim Posen <jim.posen@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2018 15:15:50 -0700
Message-ID: <CADZtCSjsLSr_A-cBG5weAgstW9RG0sDL1txHC_E9ksVL=xJ4uA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Andreas Schildbach <andreas@schildbach.de>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000fa856f0569c236db"
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 13 Apr 2018 22:16:39 +0000
Cc: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] BloomFilter issue with segwit addresses
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2018 22:15:51 -0000
--000000000000fa856f0569c236db
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Why not add the outpoints owned by the wallet to the filter and watch for
those instead of elements in the input script or witness data?
On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 12:12 PM, Jonas Schnelli via bitcoin-dev <
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> Hi Andreas
>
> Thanks for bringing this up and this seems indeed to be suboptimal.
>
> > I wonder if Bitcoin Core would be willing to extend the BIP37 matching
> > rules such that data elements in the witness are also matched against?
>
> Bitcoin Core is not an identity that can be =E2=80=9Ewilling to extend=E2=
=80=9C (or
> reject) a feature.
> Someone needs to come up with a proposal (pull request).
>
> Maybe an extension for BIP37 would make sense (*meh*).
> Just inserting the witness data into the bloom filter seems to be an easy
> solution (CBloomFilter::IsRelevantAndUpdate())
>
> /jonas
>
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>
>
--000000000000fa856f0569c236db
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<div dir=3D"ltr">Why not add the outpoints owned by the wallet to the filte=
r and watch for those instead of elements in the input script or witness da=
ta?</div><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Fri, =
Apr 13, 2018 at 12:12 PM, Jonas Schnelli via bitcoin-dev <span dir=3D"ltr">=
<<a href=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org" target=3D"_bla=
nk">bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockqu=
ote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc s=
olid;padding-left:1ex">Hi Andreas<br>
<br>
Thanks for bringing this up and this seems indeed to be suboptimal.<br>
<span class=3D""><br>
> I wonder if Bitcoin Core would be willing to extend the BIP37 matching=
<br>
> rules such that data elements in the witness are also matched against?=
<br>
<br>
</span>Bitcoin Core is not an identity that can be =E2=80=9Ewilling to exte=
nd=E2=80=9C (or reject) a feature.<br>
Someone needs to come up with a proposal (pull request).<br>
<br>
Maybe an extension for BIP37 would make sense (*meh*).<br>
Just inserting the witness data into the bloom filter seems to be an easy s=
olution (CBloomFilter::<wbr>IsRelevantAndUpdate())<br>
<br>
/jonas<br>
<br>______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
bitcoin-dev mailing list<br>
<a href=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org">bitcoin-dev@lists.=
<wbr>linuxfoundation.org</a><br>
<a href=3D"https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev" =
rel=3D"noreferrer" target=3D"_blank">https://lists.linuxfoundation.<wbr>org=
/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-<wbr>dev</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>
--000000000000fa856f0569c236db--
|
