1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
|
Return-Path: <user@petertodd.org>
Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org (smtp1.osuosl.org [140.211.166.138])
by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63C8AC0012
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sat, 18 Dec 2021 17:52:19 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E76C84BA5
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sat, 18 Dec 2021 17:52:19 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.398
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.398 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001,
RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001]
autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: smtp1.osuosl.org (amavisd-new);
dkim=fail (2048-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)"
header.d=petertodd.org
Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (smtp1.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id d-YO6_zL6zFF
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sat, 18 Dec 2021 17:52:18 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0
Received: from outmail149055.authsmtp.co.uk (outmail149055.authsmtp.co.uk
[62.13.149.55])
by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D694C84B9A
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sat, 18 Dec 2021 17:52:17 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-c237.authsmtp.com (mail-c237.authsmtp.com [62.13.128.237])
by punt15.authsmtp.com. (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 1BIHqE5f053335;
Sat, 18 Dec 2021 17:52:14 GMT (envelope-from user@petertodd.org)
Received: from petertodd.org (76-10-157-59.dsl.teksavvy.com [76.10.157.59])
(authenticated bits=0)
by mail.authsmtp.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id 1BIHqBDj039826
(version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO);
Sat, 18 Dec 2021 17:52:12 GMT (envelope-from user@petertodd.org)
Received: by petertodd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AFCF2A2FD3;
Sat, 18 Dec 2021 12:52:10 -0500 (EST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=petertodd.org; s=mail;
t=1639849930; bh=y3Csh9s6UZC6RXViHswvCgLwdPXJSkU47ej4FcRDpGk=;
h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From;
b=m/RQstAEc4NXms4f+SIl+EnStRn9n3Uas0s55iEtN+sfnrMcMtNTgSSoQ2bdGEduG
juWhi2kCAUjB+QPq38JD4kc7EehFl4itGDmi73Qx6Xx9Dvf/te/qX5hH9qdUHKeLHi
TEg3XQ4Q+UB7T8uwAfCWNjuXQbWSOBEVFVKsYJXx2qjGIkDWhljtuVLq+bHBHb8vq/
lF7Em/3Cvke5txPnpyJub875YNdhw5nf5o4yKEQk92Cy/HIV9VY34URmAboME2ateV
SdN0c0M/uMjvjhD2hmHkjtMozWCFTMP0lAQ8HBSIetTxX3r1AUf0Bt6JtN2JA9tnyK
jt9D0/tDCExvg==
Received: by localhost (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 32EF25F76E; Sat, 18 Dec 2021 12:52:07 -0500 (EST)
Date: Sat, 18 Dec 2021 12:52:07 -0500
From: Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org>
To: Jeremy <jlrubin@mit.edu>,
Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Message-ID: <Yb4fx0ny0tZYKmrD@petertodd.org>
References: <CALZpt+F2b3tdu1+kLZiBPCH2O-pDzZytoRFtX6X0a8UX4OBrDQ@mail.gmail.com>
<CAD5xwhjVkxgu2+M+Ft576GYM6Tv=ZEwtV82v1cLeYaoU5mSRnA@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="7xZG4+OLekTtL899"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAD5xwhjVkxgu2+M+Ft576GYM6Tv=ZEwtV82v1cLeYaoU5mSRnA@mail.gmail.com>
X-Server-Quench: 3b104958-602b-11ec-ba2e-8434971169dc
X-AuthReport-Spam: If SPAM / abuse - report it at:
http://www.authsmtp.com/abuse
X-AuthRoute: OCd2Yg0TA1ZIVwkA IjsJECJaVQIpKltL GxAVKBZePFsRUQkR
aQdMdwoUHFAXAgsB AWcbWlNeVV97WGA7 bAxPbAVDY09JQQBj T0pMXVMcFXcReV1z
ckQeURB6dQMIeX52 YUIsXSJaXEBzcE5g RE5WR3AHZDIzdTJO UhVFfwdXdApNfx5D
YwQsGhFYa3VsNCMk FAgyOXU9MCtqYBxP RRkKNlsWEw4lAzo4 AiooM30uGwUvRjk4
KB0gYnUbBktZaBl0 aTNX
X-Authentic-SMTP: 61633532353630.1024:7600
X-AuthFastPath: 0 (Was 255)
X-AuthSMTP-Origin: 76.10.157.59/25
X-AuthVirus-Status: No virus detected - but ensure you scan with your own
anti-virus system.
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Proposal: Full-RBF in Bitcoin Core 24.0
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Dec 2021 17:52:19 -0000
--7xZG4+OLekTtL899
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Sat, Dec 18, 2021 at 08:51:46AM -0800, Jeremy via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> Small idea:
>=20
> ease into getting rid of full-rbf by keeping the flag working, but make
> enforcement of non-replaceability something that happens n seconds after
> first seen.
>=20
> this reduces the ability to partition the mempools by broadcasting
> irreplaceable conflicts all at once, and slowly eases clients off of
> relying on non-RBF.
>=20
> we might start with 60 seconds, and then double every release till we get
> to 600 at which point we disable it.
Making replacability turn on _after_ an expiry time is reached has been
suggested before, IIRC by Matt Corallo. However I believe the approach of
enabling full-rbf _until_ a time is reached is clever and novel.
I'd suggest doing both at once. Long-running txs are certainly useful. But =
if a
tx hasn't been mined in a few blocks, it certainly can't be relied on for
zeroconf.
--=20
https://petertodd.org 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
--7xZG4+OLekTtL899
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=a3eL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--7xZG4+OLekTtL899--
|
