diff options
| author | Jimmy Song <jaejoon@gmail.com> | 2018-08-30 15:36:16 -0500 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | bitcoindev <bitcoindev@gnusha.org> | 2018-08-30 20:36:31 +0000 |
| commit | 072dcb2e1c24bf583c63828352ed5db59401ec56 (patch) | |
| tree | 3f49c7f7a9918dd4a6e6d229f237eb811e3e8db8 | |
| parent | 5e781d8319064ed0cc358c3170034aa4656c80cb (diff) | |
| download | pi-bitcoindev-072dcb2e1c24bf583c63828352ed5db59401ec56.tar.gz pi-bitcoindev-072dcb2e1c24bf583c63828352ed5db59401ec56.zip | |
Re: [bitcoin-dev] Testnet3 Reest
| -rw-r--r-- | c6/58243e21fca028fe74c6d0d6e24fb12c56f8c0 | 161 |
1 files changed, 161 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/c6/58243e21fca028fe74c6d0d6e24fb12c56f8c0 b/c6/58243e21fca028fe74c6d0d6e24fb12c56f8c0 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..54300c9d9 --- /dev/null +++ b/c6/58243e21fca028fe74c6d0d6e24fb12c56f8c0 @@ -0,0 +1,161 @@ +Return-Path: <jaejoon@gmail.com> +Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org + [172.17.192.35]) + by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A294FD30 + for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>; + Thu, 30 Aug 2018 20:36:31 +0000 (UTC) +X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 +Received: from mail-wm0-f46.google.com (mail-wm0-f46.google.com [74.125.82.46]) + by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1191A7D1 + for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>; + Thu, 30 Aug 2018 20:36:30 +0000 (UTC) +Received: by mail-wm0-f46.google.com with SMTP id f21-v6so3209476wmc.5 + for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>; + Thu, 30 Aug 2018 13:36:30 -0700 (PDT) +DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; + h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to + :cc; bh=l/+tryFqiK1tMJF+vXYM3NhXiJob19f7oEf3ljJ4qp8=; + b=NGK264p2o6g6qHoArOA+7SQ72mo87WT1Uc+MVPdMlreOkUQIq8Cj+CqA2wpyk/VcPV + sGofDRcMGKnX1HxronPbW3LsbRjsuBaTcJtf2qdLPRr7sFS15wJ3tBSxAaFsHt7TpKkD + EJEtdAXyGMJdHqrsK23TaRNWM5+0M3KKNCya8GyiijykSFVWUTro3rg9L8OSEnumFzTI + JfCZHBfx0aVwKA2M8URrZ6h1VgN92tCMXUnsmD37IFsUNeEJaiE9kXJtyTljZ7V2WX+X + lzubOcjDX+w+fu6RhrLKCnzP4EUWYS7ijTiLR8ENdFH9J/adlREGJiiT7+4yJBYmPZAi + e+9g== +X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; + d=1e100.net; s=20161025; + h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date + :message-id:subject:to:cc; + bh=l/+tryFqiK1tMJF+vXYM3NhXiJob19f7oEf3ljJ4qp8=; + b=qya4ITWkt09pzYkGXaYUUUBI0wfeRga8qdQmHpdarD5CJ8Z48AKx6fCXKGmaGNRvk6 + EYpf4CU8tz67wx3HNcugZB+V8bCpZ30rSZJ0xgy4sHiVc7gFLZZK7wQptq9PyQlwMYfj + mbP+8MgYdhH1PRawvNWILaqZI/ZxRNtKnyVmhuQ6+u1gpToyhznDsM2tIf6l2if6zeKH + +vyyFrA5hWkb2AtX57ZnAgaRw53lB3lp2RrGAqqqhUySy7hfpIkXCDPpxcKra34UWzwN + L+YIyEySTTdpNWO3VSc0DfNE1XOrNu6hlE8v3Ajyg652PASGNWA4K7YQdivtNOJdXoZ8 + aNdA== +X-Gm-Message-State: APzg51A9WOiIpARYxYZDqd3Xlo3gzfCEw7HG534f28tCUB2EBXyhzPzp + 2mRzxXOGbZftvNV0+tjxsHC6MhgAQADa27BY4ChZa2mWTuo= +X-Google-Smtp-Source: ANB0VdYqlid+Z0STWvC+HEYVnCWtB1Q0pozKlFv+tolKLVVRhuJLsd8epcSEO52MMhV80lp4YaOdvRSZksyxPfkPS0M= +X-Received: by 2002:a1c:c5cc:: with SMTP id + v195-v6mr2880888wmf.29.1535661389573; + Thu, 30 Aug 2018 13:36:29 -0700 (PDT) +MIME-Version: 1.0 +References: <CABuOfuh7M6siJW1FzXajsBSeYSu=TBEgx9SAmCbwnP=yb7rJOQ@mail.gmail.com> + <20180830200239.ujuzh7pitcuatdt3@petertodd.org> +In-Reply-To: <20180830200239.ujuzh7pitcuatdt3@petertodd.org> +From: Jimmy Song <jaejoon@gmail.com> +Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2018 15:36:16 -0500 +Message-ID: <CAJR7vkqt0x6KamB5Bx_bC6Zu0oxJYHHNYHS9i4q4q3++iHRz2Q@mail.gmail.com> +To: pete@petertodd.org, + Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> +Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000009ef4720574ad0709" +X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, + DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, HTML_MESSAGE, + RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 +X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on + smtp1.linux-foundation.org +X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 30 Aug 2018 23:18:54 +0000 +Cc: shiva sitamraju <shiva@blockonomics.co> +Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Testnet3 Reest +X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org +X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 +Precedence: list +List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org> +List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>, + <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe> +List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/> +List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> +List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help> +List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>, + <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe> +X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2018 20:36:31 -0000 + +--0000000000009ef4720574ad0709 +Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" + +Stupid question time: + +Why don't we have multiple testnets? + +On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 3:31 PM Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev < +bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote: + +> On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 12:58:42PM +0530, shiva sitamraju via bitcoin-dev +> wrote: +> > Hi, +> > +> > Testnet is now 1411795 blocks and a full sync is taking atleast 48 hours. +> > +> > Is a testnet reset scheduled in the next release or any reason not to do +> a +> > reset ? +> > +> > Fast onboarding/lower disk overheads would be very much appreicated for +> > testing purposes +> +> Actually I'd advocate the opposite: I'd want testnet to be a *larger* +> blockchain than mainnet to find size-related issues first. +> +> Note that for testing regtest is often a better alternative, and you can +> setup +> private regtest blockchains fairly easily and with good control over +> exactly +> when and how blocks are created. +> +> -- +> https://petertodd.org 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org +> _______________________________________________ +> bitcoin-dev mailing list +> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org +> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev +> + +--0000000000009ef4720574ad0709 +Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" +Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable + +<div dir=3D"ltr">Stupid question time:<div><br></div><div>Why don't we = +have multiple testnets?</div></div><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote"><div dir= +=3D"ltr">On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 3:31 PM Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev <<a = +href=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org">bitcoin-dev@lists.lin= +uxfoundation.org</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" = +style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">On = +Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 12:58:42PM +0530, shiva sitamraju via bitcoin-dev wrot= +e:<br> +> Hi,<br> +> <br> +> Testnet is now 1411795 blocks and a full sync is taking atleast 48 hou= +rs.<br> +> <br> +> Is a testnet reset scheduled in the next release or any reason not to = +do a<br> +> reset ?<br> +> <br> +> Fast onboarding/lower disk overheads would be=C2=A0 very much appreica= +ted for<br> +> testing purposes<br> +<br> +Actually I'd advocate the opposite: I'd want testnet to be a *large= +r*<br> +blockchain than mainnet to find size-related issues first.<br> +<br> +Note that for testing regtest is often a better alternative, and you can se= +tup<br> +private regtest blockchains fairly easily and with good control over exactl= +y<br> +when and how blocks are created.<br> +<br> +-- <br> +<a href=3D"https://petertodd.org" rel=3D"noreferrer" target=3D"_blank">http= +s://petertodd.org</a> 'peter'[:-1]@<a href=3D"http://petertodd.org"= + rel=3D"noreferrer" target=3D"_blank">petertodd.org</a><br> +_______________________________________________<br> +bitcoin-dev mailing list<br> +<a href=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org" target=3D"_blank">= +bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org</a><br> +<a href=3D"https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev" = +rel=3D"noreferrer" target=3D"_blank">https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mail= +man/listinfo/bitcoin-dev</a><br> +</blockquote></div> + +--0000000000009ef4720574ad0709-- + |