>You're also technically correct in not referring to yourself as an
>agnostic, since agnosticism is a position regarding the possibility of
>knowledge: specifically that knowledge about a given topic is unattainable
>in principle. This, I assume, is not your opinion.
Again, according to my dictionary, an agnostic is one who holds no opinion
on the existence or lack thereof of god(s).
ie a-gnostic = without knowledge.
This is also what I was taught whilst studying philosophy.
Samael