Re: Does a nanotech pleasure city have to be productive??

From: QueeneMUSE@aol.com
Date: Mon Sep 27 1999 - 16:31:13 MDT

• Next message: ronkean@juno.com: "Re: 2.3TB on a credit card?"
• Previous message: QueeneMUSE@aol.com: "Re: Does a nanotech pleasure city have to be productive??"
• Maybe in reply to: john grigg: "Does a nanotech pleasure city have to be productive??"
• Next in thread: Anders Sandberg: "Re: Does a nanotech pleasure city have to be productive??"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

In a message dated 9/27/1999 3:09:28 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
starman125@hotmail.com writes:

<< A former utopian delight could be remade into any form of
 hell where the conquerors could watch with glee as the former owners were
 forced to live as medieval serfs or denizens of Dante's hell. >>

Welcome to Hell-city!
You have chosen to invade, pillage and terrorize. The greed quadrant awaits
you. Please remove your shoes and step onto the hot tarmc. Follow the
inserstices of living bacteria to the fifth level of Hell, where you will be
stuffed full of food until your burst. Thank you for chosing Hell-city.

• Next message: ronkean@juno.com: "Re: 2.3TB on a credit card?"
• Previous message: QueeneMUSE@aol.com: "Re: Does a nanotech pleasure city have to be productive??"
• Maybe in reply to: john grigg: "Does a nanotech pleasure city have to be productive??"
• Next in thread: Anders Sandberg: "Re: Does a nanotech pleasure city have to be productive??"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:05:18 MST