Re: Does a nanotech pleasure city have to be productive??

From: QueeneMUSE@aol.com
Date: Mon Sep 27 1999 - 16:28:40 MDT


In a message dated 9/27/1999 3:09:28 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
starman125@hotmail.com writes:

<< I realize Muse that you were making the point that not every city should
 HAVE to be economically productive but ironically this city would be a
 fantastic tourist attraction!! If it were attacked it would probably be by
 the jealous combined forces of the Disney and Universal Studios Alliance! I
 can just imagine air cavalry units composed of troops mounted on flying
 Dumbo's and great white sharks! Scary!!
>>

Point well taken. I was thinking more in terms of a polulace with well
developed aesthetics and highly tuned sensory nodes, rather than
pleasure-seekers.

On another note: I have never found the "happiest place on earth"
particularly pleasant or aesthetically pleasing to the senses (especially the
food - gack!!!). Disneyland with nanotech would be well ordered, immaculate &
deadly...



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:05:18 MST