From: Craig Presson (c_presson@yahoo.com)
Date: Tue Sep 21 1999 - 14:13:11 MDT
--- Robert Owen <rowen@technologist.com> wrote:
> Joe E Dees wrote:
>
> > Neither this, nor that, nor [neither this nor that], nor [both this and
> > that].
>
> Not required. The Boolean transform of nor [both this and that] which
> is equivalent to not[this and that] is [not-this or not-that]. But this
> is the inclusive OR, so it includes as a true case [not-this AND not-that].
> But this readily transforms into not[this OR that] or neither this nor that,
> which was explicitly stated.
Yeah, but Nagarjuna lived a long time before Boole and DeMorgan :-)
===
I use this address only when I am away from home. I have
reply-to set to dhr@iname.com and I read email sent to that
address from here, so please don't use the yahoo address.
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Bid and sell for free at http://auctions.yahoo.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:05:14 MST