From: Billy Brown (bbrown@conemsco.com)
Date: Wed May 19 1999 - 15:06:51 MDT
O'Regan, Emlyn wrote:
> I'm a bit worried about all this talk of Jupiter sized brains (although
> I'm guilty of it myself).
Me too. Obviously a device built out of degenerate matter, in the shape of
a shell covering the surface of a white dwarf, would provide much better
performance in a far smaller volume of space (although the mass required is
larger by a factor of a few thousand). Come on, guys, lets see some
imagination! ;-)
> Wouldn't such a thing be a target? If someone was annoying you who was
> dependent on a Jupiter sized brain, then wouldn't you be tempted to lob
> a couple of fusion bombs at it (sorry all you pacifists out there).
Well, that's what Solar System-sized 'body' surrounding that brain is for -
a couple of solar masses worth of Dyson sphere, defense satellites and
warships will do wonders for your survivability. Besides, you can't do much
damage to something that big with a puny little energy source like nuclear
fusion - you need a real weapon, like quantum black holes with a
carefully-timed evaporation period.
> Also, in my experience, computers have been getting *smaller* as time
> wends its way towards whatever it wends its way towards. While we're all
> doing this "my brain's bigger than yours" stuff, transhumans might be
> more impressed by tiny, weeny little brains. "I've got the new
> google-flops processor(s) running my brain, it's made out of quarks, and
> is the size of the head of a match - oh wait, I've dropped it, hey,
> guys, can you help me find my brain, it's here somewhere, no, don't step
> there, aaarrgghhhh *gurgle*)..
Well, that's the problem with 'small is beautiful". I'll stick with big
guns, thick armor, and lots of empty space around me.
Of course, this is all academic anyway. By the time it is remotely possible
to actually do anything like this, we'll have much better ideas.
Billy Brown, MCSE+I
bbrown@conemsco.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:03:45 MST