From: Billy Brown (bbrown@conemsco.com)
Date: Wed May 19 1999 - 14:46:24 MDT
Eliezer S. Yudkowsky wrote:
> I don't know about that. Certainly I challenge the phrase "bad" science
> fiction, because it's been done well a couple of times... but that's not
> the point.
>
> I know of at least two instances of sub-molecular technology. (1)
> artificial atoms; (2) sculpted quantum states.
> (Unfortunately my links
> appear to be broken - sorry, guys! (1) is changing the shape of a
> single atom's wavefunction, and (2) is doing some kind of custom stuff
> on probability distributions, I think. Anyone have a valid link?)
I agree. I think Anders was on to something with his "picotech processors
living on a neutron star" idea. Creating a density regime in which it is
possible for subatomic particles to form compact structures with the same
range of complexity exhibited by normal matter is probably a very delicate
process, but it seems reasonable to think that it could be done in
principle. That being the case, we should expect than any posthuman society
would either graduate to pico-scale engineering in short order or invent
something so much better as to make it superfluous.
Billy Brown, MCSE+I
bbrown@conemsco.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:03:45 MST