Re: Mind machines, a badly neglected topic? (Was: Re: Mind Control, 1990s)

From: Joe Jenkins (joe_jenkins@yahoo.com)
Date: Fri Oct 23 1998 - 16:36:16 MDT


---den Otter <neosapient@geocities.com> wrote:

>Even a machine with just one setting, pleasure, would be
>an absolutely unbeatable product (and a very transhuman
>one too: now you control your own emotions). The stuff that
>dreamsare made of. Now of course follows the inevitable
>question: why hasn't this been done yet?

Uh, arn't these called sex toys? :-)

I've been inventing, developing, prototyping, and testing technosexual
devices for many years now. I have many extremely unique, but so far
unpatented designs, some of which would cause you to collapse in
laughter upon hearing the details. I know *I* did when I first
thought up the ideas. Many of my designs are intended to enhance
partner sex, but training has been most effective with solosexual
activity. I'll be glad to post descriptions and links to the list as
soon as I have protected my intellectual property. However, with one
of my devices, I can give somewhat of a description without giving
away the farm, because much research is needed to make it work from
the description.

It is a biofeedback technosexual stimulation device designed to teach
the capability of having a long series of intense orgasms (up to 12
hours in some test subjects, chemically aided of course). The
stimulation is a complex function of input from a sensor on the PC
muscle. The PC or Pubococcygeus muscle goes around the anus, across
the entire pelvic floor, and attaches in front to the pubic bone on
both women and men. To locate this muscle, simply stop the flow of
urine. A weak PC muscle will result in urinary incontinence.

Many sex therapist think that to keep your PC muscle toned, you should
consciously squeeze and release it during masturbation and partnersex
to intensify each orgasm. These contractions can be felt in the anus,
vagina, clitoris, and penis (if you have *all* of those, your doing
very good :-)). They also recommend tightening and releasing it as an
exercise throughout the day, to improve your functioning. I disagree
with the former and the later for different reasons. Both of which
are overcome by training from my machine which develops "fast
reflexive" muscles designed for extreme involuntary contractions of
the PC muscle. I'm not ready to say much more about my devices on the
wider list yet, but hopefully will within the next year. That is, if
I ultimately decide they are transhuman in nature, some of them
certainly are.

The ones with biofeedback from the PC muscle are far too addictive to
make available as a commercial product and not expect legal problems.
Of course, I *will* do it anyway :-). Coming soon to a net-store near
you.

> Now, can anyone tell me: why on earth isn't this product on
> the market yet? Are there technical problems, or is everyone
> just missing a great opportunity here? I mean, one could get
> richer than Bill Gates by making a product that will virtually sell
> *itself*, and no doubt will change society quite a bit in the process.

Improper usage can cause injury.

Improper sharing or cleaning/maintaining can transmit disease or
infection.
Mental and possibly physical addiction.

"For novelty use only"-not applicable because of needed detailed
instructions

Body physiology variability, especially in female clitoris and G-spot

Limited market for complex learning curve techno devices - no matter
what the reward.

Alleged sexual orientation reversal (someone recently won an award in
civil court alleging this due to an auto accident injury)

Joe Jenkins
joe_jenkins@yahoo.com
_________________________________________________________
DO YOU YAHOO!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 14:49:41 MST