Re: What makes science science?

From: Randall R Randall (rrandall6@juno.com)
Date: Mon Sep 07 1998 - 13:35:51 MDT


    --
On Sun, 6 Sep 1998 02:16:59 -0700 "J. R. Molloy" <jr@shasta.com> writes:
>Randall R Randall

>>>Science relies on empirical evidence; religion relies on
>>>faith.
>>
>>This one would require some defense, I think.
>
>Have you read Richard Dawkins?

Some. The problem is that *everything* rests
on assumptions, and it is sometimes difficult to
defend scientific assumptions over religious ones.
The *only* thing that I know of which we can point
to is science's track record so far, and that doesn't
seem to be very convincing to religionists.

    --digsig
         Wolfkin.
     5CaaHx/ncmWI7mi94lMRbZ5naWfoiAiWyG37UUfee/P
     mBLiYDa3JzmUBHnhXeUIAow8NSmb7MywB0pCGjFk
     4X/NmYrqIox6sdcw8B7+tGCz4GN0HQuubUvbOC7+o

wolfkin@flatoday.infi.net | ICQ: 3043097
E-Gold Acct: 100678 @ www.e-gold.com
On a visible but distant shore a new image of man,
The shape of his own future, now in his own hands.
                                         | Johnny Clegg

_____________________________________________________________________
You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail.
Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com
Or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866]



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 14:49:33 MST