Re: The AI revolution (Was: Re: >H ART: The Truman Show)

From: den Otter (neosapient@geocities.com)
Date: Wed Jun 24 1998 - 16:41:42 MDT


Max M wrote:
>
> den Otter wrote:
>
> > That's just one way to develop AI. There might very well be others. In
> > any case, it wouldn't be very smart to just make an upgraded human
> > (with an attitude). Genie AIs is what we want, mindless servants.
>
> Then I think that your type of AI falls more into the categori of IA
> (Intelligence Amplification.) This is where very strong technical
> support systems enhances the human mind. But they are not self aware. A
> little like computers and the internet today, but only much smarter and
> more developed. Ingenious interfaces. Mindless Servants if you want.

Well, yes, that's basically what I want. Not a new kind of artificial,
superfast and highly intelligent humanoid with a "will", but a machine
that can (more or less autonomously) conduct research at a lightning
pace. A machine that doesn't ponder ethics, but rather dutifully serves
and protects humans becuase it's been programmed that way. All
"emotions"
that [turn out] to be either superfluous, or harmful to its efficiency
(at solving problems) should be left out.

Although this machine wouldn't be "conscious" like a human, it would
nonetheless still classify as "intelligent", since it could
learn from its own and other's mistakes or success, and improve
its performance. Is this what they call "weak" AI?



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 14:49:13 MST