Re: Erik's Fallacy

From: Ian Goddard (igoddard@erols.com)
Date: Sat Apr 25 1998 - 14:47:34 MDT


At 02:38 PM 4/25/98 -0400, I wrote:

> IAN: Erik, what your saying is illogical by the
> very facts that you concede. Your trying to imply
> that ExI is a member of a subset of cults that even
> you admit does not exist.

  IAN: The membership does not exist, not the
  subset. Also, Erik did not explicitly say that
  "bad cult" traits are not found in ExI, but
  it was implicit. The best he could cite for
  "ritual" (a necessary trait of a religion)
  is the holding of "regular meetings." Good
  grief, a baseball team holds regular meet-
  ings, and may even have a set of principles,
  so is a baseball team a religion and thus
  a cult? If so, that dissolves the word.

  Also, ExI is democratic in nature. Religions
  don't have votes on changing their "Bible."

  Erik, get off this "cult" attack. I think that
  ExI is always open to construct critique, but
  yours is clearly designed to be destructive.

****************************************************************
VISIT Ian Williams Goddard ----> http://www.erols.com/igoddard
________________________________________________________________

MYSTICAL EXPERIENCE ---> http://www.erols.com/igoddard/meta.htm
________________________________________________________________



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 14:48:59 MST