Context vs Crackpotism

From: Ian Goddard (igoddard@erols.com)
Date: Thu Mar 19 1998 - 01:56:16 MST


Anton Sherwood (dasher@netcom.com) wrote:

>Admittedly the term is not meaningful without
>a context, namely the scale in question.

  IAN: That's exactly what I'm saying with
  respect to identity: there is no identity
  external to context. Everything that exists
  exists in context, and context is holistic.

  When we say what an elephant is (a member
  of X family of animals that live in Y set
  of locations), we put it in context, yet
  when we say what A is, "A=A," we remove
  it from context. When I define identity
  as "A is A relative to ~A," I put it
  in context, as it exists in reality.

  Nobody has ever shown me an example of
  a thing, A, being A free from relation,
  and yet all those who cannot show that
  such is true, continue to claim that
  it is. That defines crackpotism.

****************************************************************
VISIT Ian Williams Goddard ----> http://www.erols.com/igoddard
________________________________________________________________

GODDARD'S METAPHYSICS --> http://www.erols.com/igoddard/meta.htm
________________________________________________________________



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 14:48:46 MST