Tangible vs True ??

From: Ian Goddard (igoddard@erols.com)
Date: Thu Mar 19 1998 - 01:15:05 MST


Lee Daniel Crocker (lcrocker@mercury.colossus.net)

>> IAN: Where did I say "a definition is an argument"?
>
>In almost everything you write. You spend pages and pages
>on defining "Identity" and claim that this is an exercise
>of reason in itself. You can have your definition if you
>like--it's no skin off my nose. But the old definition--
>even if it's "wrong" in some sense--manages to feed me,
>build houses, move me around, and generally make my life
>interesting. If you want us to accept your definition,
>show us how using your definition /accomplishes/ something
>tangible and real in my life.

  IAN: That there is, a tangible world is a result
  of the fact that identity is holistic. If atomism
  was somehow true, there would be no tangible world.
  Every thing is what it is only due to relations.
  So holistic identity gives you a tangible world.

  For me, a quest into the nature of truth seems much
  more interesting and important than faster cars and
  better mouse traps. To me it seems that seeing such
  things as the end-all measure of value is trivial
  and shallow, but that's what makes me a weirdo.

****************************************************************
VISIT Ian Williams Goddard ----> http://www.erols.com/igoddard
________________________________________________________________

TWA-800 CASE CORE --> http://www.erols.com/igoddard/twa-core.htm
________________________________________________________________



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 14:48:46 MST