From: Lee Daniel Crocker (lcrocker@calweb.com)
Date: Mon Jun 30 1997 - 23:59:51 MDT
> > >you have to be able to identify your counterpart,
> >
> >You have to know your in the game, that your counterpart exists, but you
> >don't have to identify him.
>
> Not true. If you can't determine specifically who you are dealing with in
> any iteration you can't perform the tit-for-tat strategy.
Actually, neither is quite correct: for an iterated Prisoner's dilemma,
you have to know at each iteration your opponent's history of dealings
with you, but not specifically who he is.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 14:44:32 MST