Re: Another Hypothesis

From: Dehede011@aol.com
Date: Tue Dec 31 2002 - 12:16:53 MST


In a message dated 12/31/2002 10:44:41 AM Central Standard Time,
mail@HarveyNewstrom.com writes: These two citations don't sound like the list
of a eight news stories that I posted. I still cannot tell if you are
looking at the list I posted twice. They specifically stated that "secret
evidence" was used, using those exact words.

Harvey,
       Go back and track down our thread to see what has been said. I stated
that I have gone through that entire set of citations you first provided. I
refered to the Moslem "Charity" that was forbidden to continue operations in
this country. I referred to the definition of "secret evidence" used in the
court. I believe it was different than the one you use but that is for you
to decide. I referred to the fact that your long list of evidence pretty
much came to nothing.
       In addition I referred to having tried to read every citation you
provided but that some returned an error message or otherwise no longer being
available. No, I do not intend to follow up up any further. So far the
"evidence" you have offered has turned out to be underwhelming and I quit.
Ron h.
 



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jan 15 2003 - 17:58:58 MST