From: Harvey Newstrom (mail@HarveyNewstrom.com)
Date: Tue Dec 31 2002 - 09:27:45 MST
Dehede011@aol.com wrote,
> Harvey,
> You have discovered a case that I referred to you in an
> email via this list several days ago.
> The other citation you offered me is a case where the
> judge closed the courtroom in the interests of national security.
These two citations don't sound like the list of a eight news stories that I
posted. I still cannot tell if you are looking at the list I posted twice.
They specifically stated that "secret evidence" was used, using those exact
words. I don't see how you can miss this with deliberately doing so.
> You have illustrated the problem with your labeling things "secret
> evidence." That label is not precise in its meaning and you give
> us no clue as to exactly what you are talking about.
I have not labeled anything thus. The headlines and newspaper articles used
the exact words "secret evidence". The judge, prosecuters and Ashcroft
himself are quoted using the words "secret evidence". How can you read this
and still claim that I am reading the concept of secret evidence into what
they are saying
You are either very confused or deliberately lying about these articles.
Unless you can point to a specific link and explain why the words "secret
evidence" don't really mean secret evidence, I can't respond to your vague
dismissals.
-- Harvey Newstrom, CISSP <http://HarveyNewstrom.com>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jan 15 2003 - 17:58:58 MST