From: Spudboy100@aol.com
Date: Sat Dec 07 2002 - 01:02:37 MST
Ross F opined:
<<Set theory and numbers would exist without a physical universe, it's
possible to conceive of the numbers without a requirement of a physical
universe.>>
I am guessing that set theory is the result of human neural integration and
such organic features as opposable thumbs, hand eye coordination, the
discovery and implementation of fire, and a host of other occurrences due to
evolution.
Set theory may be recognized as something discernible in nature, but it takes
a human brain to view this, Squirrels, Lowland Gorillas, Toucans, and
Angelfish have no concept of set theory. Up until now it takes a specialized
mammal, called human, to see this.
If the human brain didn't function as it does, there is no set theory. Unless
some other intelligent specie evolves, some sophisticated computer A.I.;
really set theory doesn't seem to exist. Set theory is the activity, then of
humans comprehending mathematics, which itself, is a
caused by a complex set of neurons moving chemicals around, which conduct
electrical pulses. Hence, even thought itself is material, in an identifiable
way. Juices go squish-squish, and the neuron cells go buzz-buzz from
electrons jumping.
Question? Do you hold math as a sacrosanct, non-material, part of the cosmos,
even though it appears as a development of biological and cultural actions?
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jan 15 2003 - 17:58:36 MST