From: Chuck Kuecker (ckuecker@ckent.org)
Date: Fri Aug 30 2002 - 07:30:54 MDT
At 08:42 PM 8/29/2002 -0400, you wrote:
>I am not against public nudity. But performing lewd and lascivious acts
>in the presence of people who object is initiation of force. If this were
>in a common public area, you might argue differently. But these people
>deliberately went into the church and performed this stunt to annoy and
>get a response from the churchgoers. They are deliberately trying to
>disrupt the activities of others, rather than pursuing their own
>activities. In the spirit of freedom and pursuit of happiness, it seem
>clear that the perpetrators are the initiators of force and the
>churchgoers were the victims. This was clearly an attack on the church
>and it is the churchgoers who want to be left alone to pursue their own
>freedoms.
>
>--
>Harvey Newstrom, CISSP <www.HarveyNewstrom.com>
>Principal Security Consultant <www.Newstaff.com>
Perhaps a nitpick - but I got the impression that this stunt was carefully
hidden in the back of the church to prevent discovery - the "fun" was the
broadcast of the blow-by-blow by the station person on the phone.
Did anyone in the church realize this was happening until the broadcast
made it obvious?
Regardless, an act of trespass and disrespect to the church and congregation.
Chuck Kuecker
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Nov 02 2002 - 09:16:33 MST