Re: Ad hominem? I think not.

From: Mike Lorrey (mlorrey@datamann.com)
Date: Wed Nov 21 2001 - 11:47:27 MST

• Next message: Mike Lorrey: "Re: Moving toward a police state?"
• Previous message: Mike Lorrey: "Re: If we do get Afghanistan, what shall we do with it?"
• In reply to: Curious: "Re: Ad hominem? I think not."
• Next in thread: Charlie Stross: "Re: Ad hominem? I think not."
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Curious wrote:
>
> > was "overboard and overly broad", or that after Mr. Bin Laden says he
> wants to kill Americans
>
> hmm...
> HAD BIN LADEN AN LEGAL TRIAL IN GENEVA??????????????????????????????
> NO
> any other questions?

Yes, where did you get your pathetic education? The World Court is not
in Switzerland, it is at The Hague.

Furthermore, you can't put the guy on trial until you catch him.

>
> ...
> i don't hear.
> so i have one :
>
> who (in USA) is responsible for waging this war?

All those muslims who conspired in the attack on this are responsible.

• Next message: Mike Lorrey: "Re: Moving toward a police state?"
• Previous message: Mike Lorrey: "Re: If we do get Afghanistan, what shall we do with it?"
• In reply to: Curious: "Re: Ad hominem? I think not."
• Next in thread: Charlie Stross: "Re: Ad hominem? I think not."
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Nov 02 2002 - 08:12:05 MST