Re: Is GAC Friendly?

From: J. R. Molloy (jr@shasta.com)
Date: Sat Jun 30 2001 - 21:40:34 MDT

• Next message: Lee Corbin: "RE: European vs. American Fanaticism"
• Previous message: J. R. Molloy: "A Brief History of A. I."
• In reply to: Mike Lorrey: "Re: Is GAC Friendly?"
• Next in thread: J. R. Molloy: "A.I. Phone Home?"
• Reply: J. R. Molloy: "A.I. Phone Home?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

> First, lets look at how humans do this:
>
> a) patterning on those who spend the most time with us, they become the
> greatest influences
> b) patterning on those who we determine state the most 'truth' and have
> the highest trust ratings with us.
> c) patterning on perceptions of beauty (what is beauty?)
> d) etc
>
> Mike Lorrey

Couldn't an updated GAC do the same, only with more objectivity?

(beauty = symmetrical elegance as determined by genetic predisposition)

ô¿ô

Stay hungry,

--J. R.

Useless hypotheses:
 consciousness, phlogiston, philosophy, vitalism, mind, free will, qualia,
analog computing, cultural relativism

     Everything that can happen has already happened, not just once,
     but an infinite number of times, and will continue to do so forever.
     (Everything that can happen = more than anyone can imagine.)

• Next message: Lee Corbin: "RE: European vs. American Fanaticism"
• Previous message: J. R. Molloy: "A Brief History of A. I."
• In reply to: Mike Lorrey: "Re: Is GAC Friendly?"
• Next in thread: J. R. Molloy: "A.I. Phone Home?"
• Reply: J. R. Molloy: "A.I. Phone Home?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Nov 02 2002 - 08:08:23 MST