From: Eugene Leitl (Eugene.Leitl@lrz.uni-muenchen.de)
Date: Fri Jun 01 2001 - 10:14:46 MDT
On Fri, 1 Jun 2001, S.J. Van Sickle wrote:
> Cheaper and safer? Such as?
As a stopgap measure, coal, oil and methane, as microinstallations.
Meanwhile, getting non-Carnot processes running with fuel reformers up to
speed, then phasing out fossils with hydrogen/photovoltaics, both
terrestrial and using photovoltaics sats (launched from Luna, and
microwaving power down to rectenna grids on ground via phased array
integrated into panels).
Nuke really makes no sense in biosphere context.
______________________________________________________________
ICBMTO : N48 10'07'' E011 33'53'' http://www.lrz.de/~ui22204
57F9CFD3: ED90 0433 EB74 E4A9 537F CFF5 86E7 629B 57F9 CFD3
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Nov 02 2002 - 08:07:53 MST