From: David Lubkin (lubkin@unreasonable.com)
Date: Tue Sep 12 2000 - 20:15:10 MDT
Catching up on the list...
Space colonization is better than planetary colonization for technological
man or uber-man; the value of avoiding gravity wells has been well-known
for decades.
But: Just as we should go to space in part to avoid putting all our eggs
in one basket, I think we should also have some solutions that fail-safe.
Some of us sentients should live in habitats that are not dependent on
advanced technology. That come with a biosphere that is capable of
sustaining organic, sentient life without use of technology.
Earth qualifies. A terraformed Mars or areoformed sentients on an
unmodified Mars qualify. Stardancers (Spider Robinson) qualify. Uploads
or AIs in a rad-hard, fault-tolerant architecture might qualify. I'm
skeptical about hollowed-out asteroids and L-5; I like them, but I haven't
seen designs that don't require on-going use of technology to sustain
life.
-- David Lubkin.
______________________________________________________________________________
lubkin@unreasonable.com || Unreasonable Software, Inc. || www.unreasonable.com
a trademark of USI:
> > > > > B e u n r e a s o n a b l e .
______________________________________________________________________________
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:30:56 MST