Re: Emotions and neural events [Was: Re: fools]

From: J. R. Molloy (jr@shasta.com)
Date: Sun Mar 05 2000 - 21:09:15 MST

• Next message: Robert Owen: "Re: failure of debate"
• Previous message: Spike Jones: "Re: imaging the world"
• Maybe in reply to: Brent Allsop: "Emotions and neural events [Was: Re: fools]"
• Next in thread: Robert Owen: "Re: Emotions and neural events [Was: Re: fools]"
• Reply: Robert Owen: "Re: Emotions and neural events [Was: Re: fools]"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Max More has asked,
> ...can mind be explained naturalistically or do we
>need to resort to a supernatural explanation?

I don't think we need to resort to a supernatural explanation, but why do we
need to explain mind?

Cheers,

--J. R.

• Next message: Robert Owen: "Re: failure of debate"
• Previous message: Spike Jones: "Re: imaging the world"
• Maybe in reply to: Brent Allsop: "Emotions and neural events [Was: Re: fools]"
• Next in thread: Robert Owen: "Re: Emotions and neural events [Was: Re: fools]"
• Reply: Robert Owen: "Re: Emotions and neural events [Was: Re: fools]"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:27:11 MST