summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/web/ufHelp/Q5.html
blob: 85f1da63afafbfc6c67e9fd7e3b860ffd4ba0472 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
<head>
<script>
	function loadDistribution(name, mean, stdDev) {
			var args = 
					{
							"caption": "Loaded our interpretation of " + name + "\'s probability distribution.",
							"Q5.mean": mean,
							"Q5.stdDev": stdDev
					};
			top.loadData(args);
	}
</script>
</head>
<body>
<P CLASS="western" STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in">Two components are
necessary to simulate the brain successfully: hardware and software.
When will we have sufficient understanding of the brain to be able to create neuromorphic human-level AI? Assume no major disruptions to business as usual, such as human intelligence enhancement, nuclear war or other disasters that set back science, or AI.</P>
<UL>
	<LI><P CLASS="western" STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in">
	<B>Claim:</B>
	&quot;Steven Rose, a neurobiologist at England's Open University,
	rejects the premise that the software of the human brain can be
	encoded in a computer. He suspects that computation occurs at scales
	above and below the level of individual neurons and synapses, via
	genetic, hormonal, and other processes.&quot;<BR>
	<B>Implication:</B>
	The brain is so complicated we'll never be able to get the software
	right. 
	<input type="button" onclick="loadDistribution('Horgan', 2.5, 0.08);" value="Load value"</input><BR>
	<B>Source:</B> Horgan, John. &quot;The Consciousness
	Conundrum.&quot; IEEE Spectrum June 2008: 36-41. IEEE Spectrum
	Online. &lt;<U><A TARGET="_blank" CLASS="western" HREF="http://www.spectrum.ieee.org/jun08/6280" TARGET="_blank">http://www.spectrum.ieee.org/jun08/6280</A></U>&gt;.</P>
	<LI><P CLASS="western">
	<B>Claim: </B>IBM, in cooperation with Henry
	Markram, launched a project in May 2005, Blue Brain, with the
	long-term goal of completely simulating a human brain at the
	molecular level. Their first milestone, simulating a single rat
	neocortical column, was achieved in December 2006. A 2008 article in
	SEED magazine said, &quot;But if computing speeds continue to
	develop at their current exponential pace, and energy efficiency
	improves, Markram believes that he'll be able to model a complete
	human brain on a single machine in ten years or less.&quot;<BR>
	<B>Implication:</B>
	The entire human brain could be simulated by 2018.
	<input type="button" onclick="loadDistribution('Markram', 1.832, 0.08);" value="Load value"</input><BR>
	<B>Sources:</B>
	IBM Research. Blue Brain Project. &quot;IBM and EPFL Join Forces to
	Uncover the Secrets of Cognitive Intelligence.&quot; Press release.
	6 June 2005. Retrieved 9 Aug. 2008.
	&lt;<FONT COLOR="#000080"><U><A TARGET="_blank" CLASS="western" HREF="http://domino.research.ibm.com/comm/pr.nsf/pages/news.20050606_cognitiveintelligence.html" TARGET="_blank">http://domino.research.ibm.com/comm/pr.nsf/pages/news.20050606_cognitiveintelligence.html</A></U></FONT>&gt;.<BR>Lehrer,
	Jonah. &quot;Out of the Blue.&quot; Seed Magazine. 3 Mar. 2008.
	&lt;<U><A TARGET="_blank" CLASS="western" HREF="http://www.seedmagazine.com/news/2008/03/out_of_the_blue.php?page=all&amp;p=y" TARGET="_blank">http://www.seedmagazine.com/news/2008/03/out_of_the_blue.php?page=all&amp;p=y</A></U>&gt;.</P>
	<LI><P CLASS="western">
	<B>Claim:</B> In April 2007, a team from the
	IBM Almaden Research Lab and the University of Nevada successfully
	simulated a crude representation of half a mouse brain on a Blue
	Gene/L supercomputer at one-tenth speed. The simulation had
	8,000,000 neurons and up to 6,300 synapses per neuron. &quot;Biologically
	consistent dynamical processes&quot; were observed.<BR>
	<B>Implication:</B>
	We may not be far from simulating a mouse brain on a computer,
	meaning that human brain simulations may not be far off. The basic
	neuroarchitecture of mouse and human brains is largely the same. The
	main difference is the human brain's size, not the nature of
	its parts. So a successful human brain simulation may be feasible
	within a few decades or less.
	<input type="button" onclick="loadDistribution('Modha et al.', 1.9030, 0.04);" value="Load value"</input><BR>
	<B>Source:</B> &quot;Mouse brain
	simulated on computer.&quot; BBC News. 27 Apr. 2007.
	&lt;<FONT COLOR="#000080"><U><A TARGET="_blank" CLASS="western" HREF="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/6600965.stm" TARGET="_blank">http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/6600965.stm</A></U></FONT>&gt;.</P>
	<LI><P CLASS="western">
	<B>Claim:</B> By 2029, we'll have brain scans
	with high enough resolution that we'll be able to run simulations of
	the human brain with such accuracy that these simulations will be
	considered real people and display human-level
	intelligence.<BR>
	<B>Implication:</B> Probability peak around
	2029.
	<input type="button" onclick="loadDistribution('Kurzweil', 1.8976, 0.04);" value="Load value"</input><BR>
	<B>Source:</B> Kurzweil, Ray. <U><A TARGET="_blank" CLASS="western" HREF="http://www.amazon.com/Singularity-Near-Humans-Transcend-Biology/dp/0143037889/">The
	Singularity Is Near: When Humans Transcend</A><A TARGET="_blank" CLASS="western" HREF="http://www.amazon.com/Singularity-Near-Humans-Transcend-Biology/dp/0143037889/">
	</A><A TARGET="_blank" CLASS="western" HREF="http://www.amazon.com/Singularity-Near-Humans-Transcend-Biology/dp/0143037889/">Biology</A></U>.
	New York: Viking Adult, 2005.</P>
</UL>
</body>