summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/ff/f2450cde8331674bad27b268a58ed20792d091
blob: 624cea62f33dc44db0c597877870840ec7872389 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
Received: from sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.192]
	helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
	by sfs-ml-3.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <bitcoin-list@bluematt.me>) id 1QyCpF-0000Mk-67
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Tue, 30 Aug 2011 01:09:13 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of bluematt.me
	designates 173.246.101.161 as permitted sender)
	client-ip=173.246.101.161;
	envelope-from=bitcoin-list@bluematt.me; helo=mail.bluematt.me; 
Received: from vps.bluematt.me ([173.246.101.161] helo=mail.bluematt.me)
	by sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	id 1QyCpD-0007lP-08 for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Tue, 30 Aug 2011 01:09:13 +0000
Received: from [192.168.1.2] (dhcp04346.highsouth-resnet.unc.edu
	[152.23.97.28])
	by mail.bluematt.me (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AF18DBB4
	for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
	Tue, 30 Aug 2011 03:07:28 +0200 (CEST)
From: Matt Corallo <bitcoin-list@bluematt.me>
To: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
In-Reply-To: <CABsx9T20JDnt5xF24HbJdhHe=MFZ3PDyk2cE+Q4V8iC0rgbASg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABsx9T20JDnt5xF24HbJdhHe=MFZ3PDyk2cE+Q4V8iC0rgbASg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2011 21:09:03 -0400
Message-ID: <1314666543.5889.2.camel@BMThinkPad.lan.bluematt.me>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.2 
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: -2.0 (--)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
	See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
	-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
	sender-domain
	-0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
	-0.5 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay
	domain 0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Headers-End: 1QyCpD-0007lP-08
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Project status
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 01:09:13 -0000

On Mon, 2011-08-29 at 16:10 -0400, Gavin Andresen wrote:
> Quick brain dump on a bunch of stuff:
> 
> I'd like to get a 0.4 release out, but am still working on a fix for
> the deadlock bugs that the new wallet encryption and/or the CWallet
> refactoring caused. My short-term plan is to reduce the number of
> locks and make sure they're always acquired in a consistent order.
> Longer term, I think reworking the design to be based on
> boost::asio and use fewer threads is probably the right thing to do.
Hopefully working on something that would help do this now.
> 
> Other things on the 0.4 TODO list:  block chain checkpoint (got a PULL
> for that, thanks).  Updated list of hard-coded seed nodes (nanotube
> did that last time). Pieter's dump/import privkey patch.
Also my build update pull would be much appreciated.
> 
> After my talk at the conference, Alex Waters approached me about being
> the core bitcoin Q/A lead; he'll be working on creating test plans,
> keeping on top of the issues list, testing new features, and
> suggesting improvements to the code/test/release process.  And
> whatever else he thinks needs to be done to improve core bitcoin.
NICE