1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
|
Return-Path: <j@toom.im>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8E211E54
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sun, 7 Feb 2016 18:53:19 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from c.mail.sonic.net (c.mail.sonic.net [64.142.111.80])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8CB0DE1
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sun, 7 Feb 2016 18:53:18 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [192.168.1.190] (63.135.62.197.nwinternet.com [63.135.62.197]
(may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0)
by c.mail.sonic.net (8.15.1/8.15.1) with ESMTPSA id u17IrDSZ004110
(version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT);
Sun, 7 Feb 2016 10:53:15 -0800
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
boundary="Apple-Mail=_9A585F13-0D2C-4172-8689-888AFD99F350";
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512
X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 2.5.2
From: Jonathan Toomim <j@toom.im>
In-Reply-To: <CABeL=0i8_Ns25=OaXG86uSsQKzPA2YbTU_zRj6k6K48aYhw3wA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 7 Feb 2016 10:55:52 -0800
Message-Id: <7E723AB3-ED80-40CE-B5BD-DD5F69486C16@toom.im>
References: <CABsx9T1Bd0-aQg-9uRa4u3dGA5fKxaj8-mEkxVzX8mhdj4Gt2g@mail.gmail.com>
<201602060012.26728.luke@dashjr.org>
<CABm2gDrns0+eZdLyNk=tDNbnMsC1tT1MfEY93cJf1V_8TPjmLA@mail.gmail.com>
<CABsx9T2LuMZciXpMiY24+rPzhj1VT6j=HJ5STtnQmnfnA_XFUw@mail.gmail.com>
<CABeL=0i8_Ns25=OaXG86uSsQKzPA2YbTU_zRj6k6K48aYhw3wA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Jannes Faber <jannes.faber@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
X-Sonic-CAuth: UmFuZG9tSVbVxcC0nLfVk3Kpx+DgbOPLSmnqUGO1ofL9K5newJdPiImB6ryb9t+L11Ug2vz5jDf7J0/X3rS2O/LSL0ymM+mI
X-Sonic-ID: C;IF2ICszN5RGwGsEl14k5kQ== M;aqpAC8zN5RGwGsEl14k5kQ==
X-Sonic-Spam-Details: 0.0/5.0 by cerberusd
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP proposal: Increase block size limit to 2
megabytes
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Feb 2016 18:53:19 -0000
--Apple-Mail=_9A585F13-0D2C-4172-8689-888AFD99F350
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="Apple-Mail=_5CFE9F28-8C99-4E37-BFA0-AF58769D79F9"
--Apple-Mail=_5CFE9F28-8C99-4E37-BFA0-AF58769D79F9
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=us-ascii
On Feb 6, 2016, at 9:21 PM, Jannes Faber via bitcoin-dev =
<bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> They *must* be able to send their customers both coins as separate =
withdrawals.
>=20
Supporting the obsolete chain is unnecessary. Such support has not been =
offered in any cryptocurrency hard fork before, as far as I know. I do =
not see why it should start now.
> If not, that amounts to theft of their customers funds.
>=20
If they announce their planned behavior before the fork, I do not see =
any ethical or legal issues.
--Apple-Mail=_5CFE9F28-8C99-4E37-BFA0-AF58769D79F9
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/html;
charset=us-ascii
<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=us-ascii"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;"><br><div><div>On Feb 6, 2016, at 9:21 PM, Jannes Faber via bitcoin-dev <<a href="mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org">bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite"><p dir="ltr">They *must* be able to send their customers both coins as separate withdrawals.</p></blockquote>Supporting the obsolete chain is unnecessary. Such support has not been offered in any cryptocurrency hard fork before, as far as I know. I do not see why it should start now.<br><blockquote type="cite"><p dir="ltr">If not, that amounts to theft of their customers funds.</p></blockquote>If they announce their planned behavior before the fork, I do not see any ethical or legal issues. </div></body></html>
--Apple-Mail=_5CFE9F28-8C99-4E37-BFA0-AF58769D79F9--
--Apple-Mail=_9A585F13-0D2C-4172-8689-888AFD99F350
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: attachment;
filename=signature.asc
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature;
name=signature.asc
Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org
iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJWt5M4AAoJEIEuMk4MG0P13EAIAL+0oPJOJL99u9s8b1VVEl2H
ggXpGwxdN6RfkcNcY7fJnnQhI4Z5VDWhLnyYKcODlJMOw52AiXFit74ifZV2ZfE9
gdpFEibWNulRyiNa3y0G4y6b/Mhv6pwEORP8CNhIeYwvRzC7d4i2SHoET3ceSh0J
PCsGCYSKawHvwEd2dwye5eyCD5t9UtrvbX/bkFIdGravqSeqauj6+qwuLdmVLb+Z
CdAwmtyqy1urobjycrFbJnbJJdFotwFlPdZSZZd8U+PsV7+STuompiSGLN5VAJYS
rWHjnWatmn3lRXOya5bZrqJa2BHthZ1ja3IUwN29aDwg8EXtaYy7LcRzkIWAKco=
=Uc8/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--Apple-Mail=_9A585F13-0D2C-4172-8689-888AFD99F350--
|
