summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/fb/be6a78ba4d8dbc9041cb23296b2ad0938c898d
blob: f0c3890ba73750a2906a194c0800d0993b84f869 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191]
	helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
	by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <mh.in.england@gmail.com>) id 1TR3vK-0003cu-8X
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Wed, 24 Oct 2012 16:35:18 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com
	designates 74.125.82.53 as permitted sender)
	client-ip=74.125.82.53; envelope-from=mh.in.england@gmail.com;
	helo=mail-wg0-f53.google.com; 
Received: from mail-wg0-f53.google.com ([74.125.82.53])
	by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76) id 1TR3vG-0006J5-EB
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Wed, 24 Oct 2012 16:35:18 +0000
Received: by mail-wg0-f53.google.com with SMTP id dr1so443602wgb.10
	for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
	Wed, 24 Oct 2012 09:35:08 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.180.85.99 with SMTP id g3mr7176033wiz.5.1351096508259; Wed, 24
	Oct 2012 09:35:08 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: mh.in.england@gmail.com
Received: by 10.216.236.30 with HTTP; Wed, 24 Oct 2012 09:35:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.216.236.30 with HTTP; Wed, 24 Oct 2012 09:35:08 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20121024162255.GA30290@vps7135.xlshosting.net>
References: <CANEZrP0XALwBFJyZTzYd5xBp4MRrjv0s_y2tOXbO7UgjWF2HzA@mail.gmail.com>
	<20121024162255.GA30290@vps7135.xlshosting.net>
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 18:35:08 +0200
X-Google-Sender-Auth: Tciy_f6HX-M39bkwYM6EXgCY3Nk
Message-ID: <CANEZrP1sxtOb+czMtBTkmzngEwMYRqD667WyKQkAOKLi+mGBGQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Mike Hearn <mike@plan99.net>
To: Pieter Wuille <pieter.wuille@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d041825686e9be104ccd0ab21
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
	See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
	-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
	sender-domain
	0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
	(mh.in.england[at]gmail.com)
	-0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
	1.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	0.1 DKIM_SIGNED            Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
	not necessarily valid
	-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
	-0.5 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Headers-End: 1TR3vG-0006J5-EB
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Draft BIP for Bloom filtering
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 16:35:18 -0000

--f46d041825686e9be104ccd0ab21
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

> Some questions:
> * why limit the number of matching transactions to 255?

Copy/paste error in the does :(

> * what does "each hash and key in the output script" mean exactly? what
about the output script in its entirety?

It's an informal way to say data elements. If you insert a key then it
matches both single and multi sig outputs regardless of location.

> * is sharing parts of the merkle branches not worth it?

We think probably not.

--f46d041825686e9be104ccd0ab21
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8

<p><br>
&gt; Some questions:<br>
&gt; * why limit the number of matching transactions to 255?</p>
<p>Copy/paste error in the does :(</p>
<p>&gt; * what does &quot;each hash and key in the output script&quot; mean exactly? what about the output script in its entirety?</p>
<p>It&#39;s an informal way to say data elements. If you insert a key then it matches both single and multi sig outputs regardless of location.<br></p>
<p>&gt; * is sharing parts of the merkle branches not worth it?</p>
<p>We think probably not.<br><br></p>

--f46d041825686e9be104ccd0ab21--