1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
|
Received: from sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.192]
helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
by sfs-ml-3.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
(envelope-from <jtimon@monetize.io>) id 1WzTlg-0005wf-Uo
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Tue, 24 Jun 2014 16:40:24 +0000
Received: from mail-lb0-f169.google.com ([209.85.217.169])
by sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
(Exim 4.76) id 1WzTlf-0000Rw-Rs
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Tue, 24 Jun 2014 16:40:24 +0000
Received: by mail-lb0-f169.google.com with SMTP id l4so840873lbv.0
for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
Tue, 24 Jun 2014 09:40:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type;
bh=F0aDiyLTeNYpXtCBHTMfn62b0rok98o5deXVQyjV97U=;
b=Gm4q8q2II/PpMTv0MOQaJM4fptreBcqIWalY2UAu9yPMQ7FYxEcvdUwC2jgxn30e3O
m6Ccr9qAYKQPozLU1dClABBoo6F8ImKQGl8CJZXgBdD9cWBd8XxhPd6K1RtsgFutG1NK
YzNdO6ofoeXDASvpv+fWaMnrBoo4oVoEu9oE/+f7395QJ8kut3i6Wgix3EgBsWTcJOvm
PaeqhP9Om8Qa8uH0keeap31r59AGxCNqVAccEFNxsAHu2biWp2URIfFe5h3kG7qHNvO/
Af74xbt6Lp+3MF4JSKN5C3LnUDi1jDGt39sAUg78mEGZ3C1y9wHqAP5T82UwzrJJVwpo
3yAg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnSZTc1aC5n1zCNF/AC10GhjunaEnWHMFM5oorCoXXK164C0FG6gXwOim4c9bKgSzdn8T7C
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.112.122.113 with SMTP id lr17mr560333lbb.105.1403628017066;
Tue, 24 Jun 2014 09:40:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.112.185.4 with HTTP; Tue, 24 Jun 2014 09:40:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Originating-IP: [85.53.135.230]
In-Reply-To: <53A99A55.1020506@gmail.com>
References: <CAC1+kJNjcPkaHiR8mzofwXE4+4UX5nmxX5Q3rZv37v-K40p1Tw@mail.gmail.com>
<CA+s+GJDVBQVu8yH9jLu_rQmk=dsJuMUctT-iK0zzOJRYgE8k9w@mail.gmail.com>
<CAC1+kJOQ2uBo2peYKZJyPSQL6qzk6Yu-cF-tPs3GzVS6cAc53w@mail.gmail.com>
<CA+s+GJBT9u+LMqTfrTwUQrGbnrqj2u==1kmx17uQyY8899O8sw@mail.gmail.com>
<53A99A55.1020506@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2014 18:40:16 +0200
Message-ID: <CAC1+kJPycskhv7m=ygEO1htryWRju4bdzWOFfZ3cEu_uKX2k2w@mail.gmail.com>
From: =?UTF-8?B?Sm9yZ2UgVGltw7Nu?= <jtimon@monetize.io>
To: Justus Ranvier <justusranvier@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
X-Headers-End: 1WzTlf-0000Rw-Rs
Cc: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Plans to separate wallet from core
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2014 16:40:25 -0000
On 6/24/14, Justus Ranvier <justusranvier@gmail.com> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 06/24/2014 09:07 AM, Wladimir wrote:
>> My main argument for the split is that full nodes and wallets have
>> completely different usage scenarios:
>>
>> - A wallet should be online as little as possible, ideally only
>> when you do transactions or want to check for them.
>>
>> - A full node should be online 24/7 or it is virtually useless to
>> the network.
>
> I think btcd has done this right.
>
> A wallet is a daemon that runs constantly in the background, just like
> the full node.
>
> The GUI (which is distinct from the wallet) runs as little as
> possible. Presumably there's no need for a 1:1 relationship between
> wallets and GUIs.
I think he means that the wallet shouldn't be running as much as it is
currently doing.
But yes, I think you're right about wallets and GUIs not necessarily
mapping 1:1.
|
