1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
|
Received: from sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.193]
helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
by sfs-ml-2.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
(envelope-from <pete@petertodd.org>) id 1WUYR9-00089W-27
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Mon, 31 Mar 2014 09:23:23 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of petertodd.org
designates 62.13.148.106 as permitted sender)
client-ip=62.13.148.106; envelope-from=pete@petertodd.org;
helo=outmail148106.authsmtp.co.uk;
Received: from outmail148106.authsmtp.co.uk ([62.13.148.106])
by sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
id 1WUYR7-00075z-N1 for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Mon, 31 Mar 2014 09:23:23 +0000
Received: from mail-c235.authsmtp.com (mail-c235.authsmtp.com [62.13.128.235])
by punt18.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/) with ESMTP id s2V9NFKE026678;
Mon, 31 Mar 2014 10:23:15 +0100 (BST)
Received: from tilt (cust.static.84-253-54-151.cybernet.ch [84.253.54.151])
(authenticated bits=128)
by mail.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/) with ESMTP id s2V9N9WT037516
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO);
Mon, 31 Mar 2014 10:23:11 +0100 (BST)
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2014 11:23:09 +0200
From: Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org>
To: Mike Hearn <mike@plan99.net>
Message-ID: <20140331092309.GA19482@tilt>
References: <CANEZrP0AwR3WgHfwYWcrC9Z_MHPDwymWXAQwp7D8XZ+o2FsK8g@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="9amGYk9869ThD9tj"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CANEZrP0AwR3WgHfwYWcrC9Z_MHPDwymWXAQwp7D8XZ+o2FsK8g@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
X-Server-Quench: 14477b03-b8b6-11e3-b802-002590a15da7
X-AuthReport-Spam: If SPAM / abuse - report it at:
http://www.authsmtp.com/abuse
X-AuthRoute: OCd2Yg0TA1ZNQRgX IjsJECJaVQIpKltL GxAVKBZePFsRUQkR
aAdMdQMUFVQGAgsB AmIbWlReUl57WGI7 Yw5PbwBefE9KQQRv
UVdMSlVNFUsrA3oI eBd5NhlxcABHfjB5 Yk9gEHFfWEN9J0Z+
XxxcR2sbZGY1a31N WEBaagNUcgZDfk5E bwQuUz1vNG8XDQg5
AwQ0PjZ0MThBJSBS WgQAK04nCWwqJnZj H1gYEDsyG0FNSSQ+ KxBO
X-Authentic-SMTP: 61633532353630.1023:706
X-AuthFastPath: 0 (Was 255)
X-AuthSMTP-Origin: 84.253.54.151/587
X-AuthVirus-Status: No virus detected - but ensure you scan with your own
anti-virus system.
X-Spam-Score: -1.5 (-)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
sender-domain
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
X-Headers-End: 1WUYR7-00075z-N1
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] BIP 70 refund field
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2014 09:23:23 -0000
--9amGYk9869ThD9tj
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 12:07:04PM +0100, Mike Hearn wrote:
> Though I am loathe to go back and redesign this part of BIP 70 so soon
> after we shipped v1, it seems to me like the refund feature may be hard to
> implement on phones if there's no time limit for when you can receive a
> refund. Otherwise a wallet has to be looking out for refunds for payments
> you may have made years ago. So perhaps we should add a new refund field
> that embeds a PaymentDetails structure instead of being just a list of
> outputs.
>=20
> We could try and solve this problem some other way purely internally, by
> doing a kind of wallet-specific swapping process in which things like Blo=
om
> filters are calculated without all keys in them being held in memory at
> once (perhaps caching filters for old parts of the key chain on disk), so
> you can have "infinite" wallets, but eventually the huge Bloom filters th=
at
> would result would hurt efficiency in other ways. So key expiry seems
> pretty fundamental to scalability.
One of the main goals of steath addresses is actually scalability. In
particular in the refund address case you would use stealth addresses
with a per-order UUID so that refunds can be detected cheaply by just
scanning for payments to your (single) stealth address, then when those
payments are detected, check the UUID against a on-disk database. A
64-bit "UUID" is probably fine, although unfortunately with OP_RETURN
quite unexpectedly dropped to 40 bytes the standard needs to change;
might have to compromise on privacy and re-use a txin pubkey to make
things fit.
--=20
'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
0000000000000000f4f5ba334791a4102917e4d3f22f6ad7f2c4f15d97307fe2
--9amGYk9869ThD9tj
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)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=N4Oj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--9amGYk9869ThD9tj--
|
