1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
|
Return-Path: <pete@petertodd.org>
Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org (smtp4.osuosl.org [IPv6:2605:bc80:3010::137])
by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06167C0070
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 23 Dec 2022 09:46:30 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A704D4171C
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 23 Dec 2022 09:46:29 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp4.osuosl.org A704D4171C
Authentication-Results: smtp4.osuosl.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key,
unprotected) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com
header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=fm2 header.b=UxHiJTJ0
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.602
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.602 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, BITCOIN_OBFU_SUBJ=1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1,
DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001,
SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (smtp4.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id UqeVbsoOvwA5
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 23 Dec 2022 09:46:28 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp4.osuosl.org DB3BA416F7
Received: from wout4-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout4-smtp.messagingengine.com
[64.147.123.20])
by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DB3BA416F7
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 23 Dec 2022 09:46:27 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.internal [10.202.2.45])
by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEEFD3200902;
Fri, 23 Dec 2022 04:46:24 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162])
by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 23 Dec 2022 04:46:25 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=
messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type
:date:date:feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to
:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:sender
:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender
:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; t=1671788784; x=1671875184; bh=L
aoaUP1NQHymiA7e/k6xAPXXN1Yxub7RnLNViak5Glg=; b=UxHiJTJ0H0JS7o5Bk
E2WOQnDEhHSGEX/D0oyo8pRypFGRjVt+O776ZUOrjEZww1yXNW8Z/ey6U+Lkta3S
MjIG18JGUXR9AWELZCHMEySCDS8RlN/ha9Ipv/bhkTNka8tRK91CG0HxX+rhg+RW
nF7weJSjCEhw+tEP+uhCLQAFaMlrddRCAd3D+F5y3L/PJNS4G9K80j6fLV+f3YjN
OrcELdsnQ4twgIW7pPu7kFI+icOTV67yeh0uxlFmODStRoG89KgTUh3Rn6LIkHiU
HA4332ius6SNPc/2MduiT6LrI8hCqUvDB4EQMVRu7XcE2UD9KfmsGcxv0chdRjW8
yrQJg==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:73ilY8DyejWJtElK3-QBkHw7rObyfrZHCFc75heAzLvpcGSpntgO5A>
<xme:73ilY-j3Z8wiXbraqdBeMIxiLnpIdWB4-CRUsct9AofD5kfzd8LrmrSb_T8KUUKtF
J_UaAzmioYOgh_i21M>
X-ME-Received: <xmr:73ilY_lVPyIC_o_EEDGqHlz-TxzT9iqwDLKNyE67pGEKR8iCL0daFzCHFMKn5pA>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvhedrhedvgddtiecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf
curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu
uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc
fjughrpeffhffvufgfjghfkfggtgfgsehtqhhmtddtreejnecuhfhrohhmpefrvghtvghr
ucfvohguugcuoehpvghtvgesphgvthgvrhhtohguugdrohhrgheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvg
hrnhephfetueelffdvudejjeetjeejgfejfeelieeijeduieeivdeugefffeeugeelgfeu
necuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepphgvth
gvsehpvghtvghrthhouggurdhorhhg
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:73ilYyy9pPBg5yXbP-PlZC0XjHIKlZ_HIwjwZV8giSX5pLkCisBB9g>
<xmx:73ilYxTY7UDAO75PsTDjFcFGrOyCBVj5n8RnZP9vwq_tjj9m-q6wrQ>
<xmx:73ilY9aUvWCS3WZ0MQDhXPesdupf-f_5Dilp6La_vEGZ4ZHayxYkHw>
<xmx:8HilYzd_d4pCdLzYBAAJE0YuS6r5G2tTmBxzi-deY5_1sS-g3T5r4Q>
Feedback-ID: i525146e8:Fastmail
Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Fri,
23 Dec 2022 04:46:22 -0500 (EST)
Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2022 03:46:19 -0600
From: Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org>
To: vd@freebsd.org, Vasil Dimov <vd@freebsd.org>,
Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android
In-Reply-To: <Y6VbIeCp2F+jF/70@smle>
References: <Y6UbG4lcVaVmqdls@petertodd.org> <Y6VbIeCp2F+jF/70@smle>
Message-ID: <F0B752D1-223E-42C5-ABE0-8D055D8E5BF7@petertodd.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] onion addresses to try [At least 17% of Bitcoin
Core 24.x listening nodes are running full-rbf]
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2022 09:46:30 -0000
On December 23, 2022 1:39:13 AM CST, Vasil Dimov <vd@freebsd=2Eorg> wrote:
>On Thu, Dec 22, 2022 at 22:06:03 -0500, Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev wrote:
>[=2E=2E=2E]
>> a lack of a convenient source of onion addresses to try
>[=2E=2E=2E]
>
>$ bitcoin-cli getnodeaddresses 0 |jq -r 'map(select(=2Enetwork =3D=3D "on=
ion")) | =2E[]=2Eaddress'
It's not that simple=2E Because onion addresses cost close to nothing noth=
ing to obtain it's dubious to just try some on a one time basis without che=
cking to see if they actually have a longer term track record of actually e=
xisting=2E You could end up trying addresses of a one time Sybil attack=2E
The advantage of using the DNS seed records is those addresses are tested =
over long time frames, so you have a better chance of them representing rea=
l nodes=2E But my DNS seed doesn't happen to be setup to track nodes using =
Tor right now=2E
|
