1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
|
Return-Path: <shigeya@wide.ad.jp>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 78BB9CBA
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sat, 14 Jul 2018 13:56:13 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: delayed 00:07:12 by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com (out2-smtp.messagingengine.com
[66.111.4.26])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 18C417AE
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sat, 14 Jul 2018 13:56:13 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41])
by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD9CD21921;
Sat, 14 Jul 2018 09:49:00 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from web3 ([10.202.2.213])
by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Sat, 14 Jul 2018 09:49:00 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=
messagingengine.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type
:date:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:to:x-me-sender
:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=Nj14G91hLxoL1LxuMObIZ2848Qgz8
XHL5N8s/4vnpcg=; b=NzwHM8psJ3t6VHNidNc1b43CIisJQCyDlHcssE6daHL5h
f0XJTiIrv14b8AubjMq6z2HQ5EsQPvLlwgpBr0Ajy0zLQurN/sboj8wTZEYzRFfs
eqs83eSaCR0hdOWU5UVcOLMDctyRRSF7QdPKpQVlx/ZqUEjnNGrjELWBtSbTeMKJ
90gEcP9YnAGrVlGjl4UxzD326dR1UjS+qUzz8155mcMcw+OxKPDSDZE+8i4LVkBF
G2J9NnCtWBAOL+uotJ6eTHwwajL3AZi9fG2qMD2YBjNz0bDkLuoA6hyHRnsNg4mb
N8+klOAvPmUCmFAuLzTUMZ67QTGTw50O7N/Ni1HHw==
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:TP9JW8LzL-ErE9Ts22Gh966qg4Lskhwm115fSNwzDcdX1O3pmGOO9w>
<xmx:TP9JW9wcDP8koYCZpeaN1OYFpudWQaQZJxoYKHDdZR5IYSRwZw3caQ>
<xmx:TP9JWwzXp0OGYLqL4XFr6D9Y6GBW61aUM5cWtY0gzuclwI-1uIlEpQ>
<xmx:TP9JW_3-zAbBP2oIhC0LbmusB-aslPl7SXtJbgo1nbkPtp0pnNO10Q>
<xmx:TP9JWyV8llfQjA__JdPhUjp_gscxDuqwc5tiDuXWA26BIY1uqm7MhQ>
<xmx:TP9JWwa2rqsG2rXLR09TJ7S7WAMRyUJW6ChqRukBDYA8Q4_9P7aRJQ>
X-ME-Sender: <xms:TP9JWyEoY9xOuwKWeIoGrXZSY1KzPexq5CiPY2heS-tEdns6m3P5vA>
Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 99)
id F21359E422; Sat, 14 Jul 2018 09:48:59 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <1531576139.518511.1440639640.45D7AAB0@webmail.messagingengine.com>
From: Shigeya Suzuki <shigeya@wide.ad.jp>
To: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface - ajax-957169fa
Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2018 22:48:59 +0900
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
DKIM_VALID,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 14 Jul 2018 14:02:20 +0000
Subject: [bitcoin-dev] v0.16.1 test_bitcoin fails on Deian 9
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2018 13:56:13 -0000
Hi,
I observed strange result when running src/test/test_bitcoin on Debian 9.
I tested with the following platforms:
1) OS X High Sierra 10.13.6 with
./configiure --enable-debug
2) Debian 9 (with latest packages) with
./configure --enable-debug --disable-wallet --without-gui
3) Ubuntu 16.04 with:
./configure --with-debug --disable-wallet
strangely, configuration 2 cause core dump but others not:
Running 264 test cases...
unknown location(0): fatal error: in "validation_block_tests/processnewblock_signals_ordering": memory access violation at address: 0x00000000: no mapping at fault address
zsh: segmentation fault ./test_bitcoin
I guess it is due to toolchain differences.
Any thoughts?
Shigeya Suzuki
|
