1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
|
Return-Path: <kanzure@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0AC57BC7
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 8 Dec 2015 16:45:35 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-ig0-f169.google.com (mail-ig0-f169.google.com
[209.85.213.169])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4233817F
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 8 Dec 2015 16:45:34 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by igl9 with SMTP id 9so99789111igl.0
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 08 Dec 2015 08:45:32 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
:cc:content-type;
bh=4idl1jqSvJnr7HehADThtxOa8jYUO5XzwySCuNiUYZk=;
b=qi4yu/7Vfj1g0L8DMjcVUxEj/ymVITi/htDLmd0Kes1hOHNSxtREeKo/PD6YscFVCv
L4ssVWJfl5lIeVQEX/giczYHH5+4pnk9NFi7C9vFpLv+rl7Wa6LJLJU7XYFmpzBgLTNn
YgDyR1hnlHXcoKLtYDVGiLK8HGMq96TxHbi1varlu5CYcDqNDWWCc05bdQY1YStlzIfG
cmZ9MC+gJ0BzGTeO7z+xdImJPZIP1Ctfmx194Ff6sGMt29iQlHO6N17o+aYRV+veF28r
Ejmbc2H3ebMhB8zWs2wvyB/rF2pIY3I6knmFfp0q5X5JA0diFysFhB43hfBteqQKk7IP
GOuQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.30.134 with SMTP id s6mr13217080igh.36.1449593132650;
Tue, 08 Dec 2015 08:45:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.36.66.132 with HTTP; Tue, 8 Dec 2015 08:45:32 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CABCnA7Wqz76m8qo5BYT41Z=hBH+fUfOc4xsFAGg=Niv7Jgkqsg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABCnA7Wqz76m8qo5BYT41Z=hBH+fUfOc4xsFAGg=Niv7Jgkqsg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2015 10:45:32 -0600
Message-ID: <CABaSBazMd4VYhSgM0-=DWU7_AAGxvXiW2yjsft4bKw8gAtpuNg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Bryan Bishop <kanzure@gmail.com>
To: Akiva Lichtner <akiva.lichtner@gmail.com>, Bryan Bishop <kanzure@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Scaling by Partitioning
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2015 16:45:35 -0000
On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 10:27 AM, Akiva Lichtner via bitcoin-dev
<bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> and miners would have to round-robin through partitions
At first glance this proposal seems most similar to the sharding proposals:
http://diyhpl.us/wiki/transcripts/scalingbitcoin/sharding-the-blockchain/
https://github.com/vbuterin/scalability_paper/blob/master/scalability.pdf
https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/3u1m36/why_arent_we_as_a_community_talking_about/cxbamhn
http://eprint.iacr.org/2015/1168.pdf (committee approach)
> but clients would have to send more than one message in order to spend money
Offloading work to the client for spends has in the past been a
well-received concept, such as the linearized coin history idea.
- Bryan
http://heybryan.org/
1 512 203 0507
|
