summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/f5/5ddce8ab24e933407138e3aa7aaafd2c2925f7
blob: 254f9bcb77a8d2cbe32d3ee648075906a6e85626 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191]
	helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
	by sfs-ml-1.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <marek@palatinus.cz>) id 1WSWIo-0007QS-Q9
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Tue, 25 Mar 2014 18:42:22 +0000
X-ACL-Warn: 
Received: from mail-vc0-f172.google.com ([209.85.220.172])
	by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76) id 1WSWIn-0007p9-Eu
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Tue, 25 Mar 2014 18:42:22 +0000
Received: by mail-vc0-f172.google.com with SMTP id la4so1096270vcb.31
	for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
	Tue, 25 Mar 2014 11:42:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
	h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from
	:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type;
	bh=9d/+TLT3EpjK6frhJ6KLyTddgufzXgZlofzTh4jX/dg=;
	b=Ayf25uMlrSKvteFEGTEakT9vSL8DpkUOLHS+L3jNx8H3avW+MNoz3T/B5leDtzSf+P
	KPwP9W25CJedoXQ9IQTDjpDWpblwK3HWkYgLiYH4dTsZfsKYjSPfAWUOUFRt8HELYcVv
	JWrU/hOPPZfjBAD4EwWAOIT1Gvf6cD/4Pj4Qhf62ucCyL2xYHq2jwuxkN39KiQDdFGrJ
	3mCYzBa/W+zJ3faoibV5LATHuLXtmePsUsTttJ9Js4poUBhx0efdl+nf21o1Fu6i7SFZ
	KtYQn081U/84qEcE2EfDCq6IW9RVG4ZVj2NB7Y3zL7PGibaj3zmtr1qak0i9vlc5VAkn
	qf1g==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkAKkNgRKiNthXJSaTwsHdr+JWDZlNQdUxV69QVODuuxTo5AV0Wna5gecLiZEgwnDOZ0HGl
X-Received: by 10.221.28.202 with SMTP id rv10mr3128898vcb.10.1395771246800;
	Tue, 25 Mar 2014 11:14:06 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: marek@palatinus.cz
Received: by 10.58.252.66 with HTTP; Tue, 25 Mar 2014 11:13:36 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <5331C49B.2000709@gmail.com>
References: <20140322084702.GA13436@savin> <20140322150836.GG3180@nl.grid.coop>
	<20140322190825.GB6047@savin> <532DE7E6.4050304@monetize.io>
	<20140325122851.GA9818@savin>
	<CABsx9T149f9of9+sYMFazAxtRi=ZJrpA1B41buERD3+j7NGKmg@mail.gmail.com>
	<20140325134918.GB7929@savin>
	<CAJHLa0PR8v2FobPUsO73BKpvBZ3M2Zsx1F9SVGVb6TKv6zsjWw@mail.gmail.com>
	<5331C49B.2000709@gmail.com>
From: slush <slush@centrum.cz>
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2014 19:13:36 +0100
X-Google-Sender-Auth: TTcpNdnuRsZ3YqvaIWzH_z_UEik
Message-ID: <CAJna-HhL7StCb9pwKC22V3GZeDUEOBGaY6tCvv-Jk=5WOuek4Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Alan Reiner <etotheipi@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11337e045ab47404f572512b
X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
	See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
	0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
	(slush[at]centrum.cz)
	1.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
X-Headers-End: 1WSWIn-0007p9-Eu
Cc: "bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net"
	<bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Tree-chains preliminary summary
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2014 18:42:23 -0000

--001a11337e045ab47404f572512b
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

I fully agree, please keep friendly environment on this list. Btw I also
met people who were making fun about Peter's reactions on bitcoin-dev.

slush


On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 7:02 PM, Alan Reiner <etotheipi@gmail.com> wrote:

> I would echo the need for some kind of moderation.
>
> I believe Peter Todd is an extremely intelligent individual, who has a
> lot to offer the Bitcoin community.  He has a firm grasp of a lot of
> really deep Bitcoin concepts and his *technical* insight is generally
> positive.  Technically.  But the way he communicates on this list is
> *extremely* corrosive and breeds hostility.  It makes it a scary place
> to discuss things, with frequent, public ridicule of everything posted.
>
> I agree that I would rather have a friendly environment to discuss
> technicals, even if it means losing additional technical insight.
> People who would explicitly insult other contributors intelligence and
> character on a public list should be subject to some kind of negative
> reinforcement.   Maybe there's solutions other than outright banning.
>
> -Alan
>
>
>
> On 03/25/2014 01:37 PM, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 9:49 AM, Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org> wrote:
> >> For someone with 'Chief Scientist' as their job title, I'm surprised you
> >> think so little of hard evidence and so much of idol worshipping.
> > Peter, take this unprofessional, personal crap off-list.
> >
> > Mike's anecdote of hostility is not an isolated one.  Just today, a
> > bitcore developer commented on "Peter Todd's ..apocalyptic vision
> > and... negative view on bitcoin" which turned off some other
> > developers from participating more interactively.
> >
> > As I commented on IRC, open source projects are no strangers to people
> > who simultaneously (a) make useful contributions and (b) turn
> > potential contributors away with an abrasive or hostile attitude
> > toward others.  It's an unsolved problem in OSS, that I saw for 15+
> > years in the Linux kernel community.
> >
> > For this list, as Mike suggested on IRC, introducing an openly stated
> > moderation policy may be the one route.
> >
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book
> "Graph Databases" is the definitive new guide to graph databases and their
> applications. Written by three acclaimed leaders in the field,
> this first edition is now available. Download your free book today!
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/13534_NeoTech
> _______________________________________________
> Bitcoin-development mailing list
> Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
>

--001a11337e045ab47404f572512b
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr">I fully agree, please keep friendly environment on this li=
st. Btw I also met people who were making fun about Peter&#39;s reactions o=
n bitcoin-dev.<div><br></div><div>slush</div></div><div class=3D"gmail_extr=
a">

<br><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 7:02 PM, Alan Re=
iner <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:etotheipi@gmail.com" target=3D=
"_blank">etotheipi@gmail.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"=
gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-=
left:1ex">

I would echo the need for some kind of moderation.<br>
<br>
I believe Peter Todd is an extremely intelligent individual, who has a<br>
lot to offer the Bitcoin community. =A0He has a firm grasp of a lot of<br>
really deep Bitcoin concepts and his *technical* insight is generally<br>
positive. =A0Technically. =A0But the way he communicates on this list is<br=
>
*extremely* corrosive and breeds hostility. =A0It makes it a scary place<br=
>
to discuss things, with frequent, public ridicule of everything posted.<br>
<br>
I agree that I would rather have a friendly environment to discuss<br>
technicals, even if it means losing additional technical insight.<br>
People who would explicitly insult other contributors intelligence and<br>
character on a public list should be subject to some kind of negative<br>
reinforcement. =A0 Maybe there&#39;s solutions other than outright banning.=
<br>
<span class=3D"HOEnZb"><font color=3D"#888888"><br>
-Alan<br>
</font></span><div class=3D"im HOEnZb"><br>
<br>
<br>
On 03/25/2014 01:37 PM, Jeff Garzik wrote:<br>
&gt; On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 9:49 AM, Peter Todd &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:pete=
@petertodd.org">pete@petertodd.org</a>&gt; wrote:<br>
&gt;&gt; For someone with &#39;Chief Scientist&#39; as their job title, I&#=
39;m surprised you<br>
&gt;&gt; think so little of hard evidence and so much of idol worshipping.<=
br>
&gt; Peter, take this unprofessional, personal crap off-list.<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; Mike&#39;s anecdote of hostility is not an isolated one. =A0Just today=
, a<br>
&gt; bitcore developer commented on &quot;Peter Todd&#39;s ..apocalyptic vi=
sion<br>
&gt; and... negative view on bitcoin&quot; which turned off some other<br>
&gt; developers from participating more interactively.<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; As I commented on IRC, open source projects are no strangers to people=
<br>
&gt; who simultaneously (a) make useful contributions and (b) turn<br>
&gt; potential contributors away with an abrasive or hostile attitude<br>
&gt; toward others. =A0It&#39;s an unsolved problem in OSS, that I saw for =
15+<br>
&gt; years in the Linux kernel community.<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; For this list, as Mike suggested on IRC, introducing an openly stated<=
br>
&gt; moderation policy may be the one route.<br>
&gt;<br>
<br>
<br>
</div><div class=3D"HOEnZb"><div class=3D"h5">-----------------------------=
-------------------------------------------------<br>
Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O&#39;Reilly Book<br>
&quot;Graph Databases&quot; is the definitive new guide to graph databases =
and their<br>
applications. Written by three acclaimed leaders in the field,<br>
this first edition is now available. Download your free book today!<br>
<a href=3D"http://p.sf.net/sfu/13534_NeoTech" target=3D"_blank">http://p.sf=
.net/sfu/13534_NeoTech</a><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Bitcoin-development mailing list<br>
<a href=3D"mailto:Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net">Bitcoin-develo=
pment@lists.sourceforge.net</a><br>
<a href=3D"https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development=
" target=3D"_blank">https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-de=
velopment</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>

--001a11337e045ab47404f572512b--