1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
|
Return-Path: <earonesty@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org (smtp1.osuosl.org [IPv6:2605:bc80:3010::138])
by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 894C0C002C
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 8 Apr 2022 21:34:23 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71F60841AB
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 8 Apr 2022 21:34:23 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.402
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.402 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.248, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,
HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.248, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001]
autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: smtp1.osuosl.org (amavisd-new);
dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=q32-com.20210112.gappssmtp.com
Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (smtp1.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id P8M2zmPgU_cj
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 8 Apr 2022 21:34:22 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0
Received: from mail-lf1-x130.google.com (mail-lf1-x130.google.com
[IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::130])
by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 31DC784137
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 8 Apr 2022 21:34:22 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-lf1-x130.google.com with SMTP id d40so9610562lfv.11
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 08 Apr 2022 14:34:22 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=q32-com.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112;
h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
bh=TAf4YU/rJiie7zavrZQxxTLjXC1flC2f8K22praBOWw=;
b=Gj1uTqMPjLn8ZXaB8BLcizZzdwWkxhEZqspP2U5F/n9huYgo9difQ9BCKOLoe0dzUl
S7WfpXQVrxByYzHibkR/EdxaGtclRIq1MwwFFe/Mr4meu+opEXI8ms6DlKJ7PJ6FQe6S
VkCOWAq2lCD/cz5pR8cXmHn6c4FjGQWQJsmvfL8MPXF/Jm2OF7FYQqM1TF/M/LKhC/zm
BHINtGf+yk5u4elz4K+qGB63Y5ywpEm0jI8iMJmqNNXVK8sw6j4vJv1XdZ0f7VYK0u96
7xaNTn+xz3JtIZvC9AVxkVTWGToqLF90sew9Kk/LJx0Px9Ww5rrilJKXAsAFanEpnGAy
SFOQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20210112;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
bh=TAf4YU/rJiie7zavrZQxxTLjXC1flC2f8K22praBOWw=;
b=d28NFyv4GXC55+AXqWnJE1BJfzrrnqfYPmO4cInA/hywNx+wniylpo5riIR3pSF+vz
5rHuNDZSkGlocidnKMANi0If1BD8zyw24KAknnTdrYGb0tpIFQ9WgQteLeYF/UMnH9GQ
YMr+tMxO4fRpjBiK6nuamqt073bfbDGSRwgmeDR69yK87eLQSjsrE0NEk/6FzPVdy9UZ
tJRQCZ/DqfzG/Kr0D3/nC3B7lNdX407aNiyj/J3PBNqK242UgPvlW2sApXERVuFCN50j
oO4faQr6ov8/d2bTZlshgQ0+KumOwl1rfBFhQs2FctA6skf+tmxRFIL+MpPa9AqfAOun
iZDA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533Yl86Qf7LkFLdp0Lw0663RwJOaCc06YCmEqiWhdyjyL+eJ6Jft
/7OoW2IB5l2bRiOWYJY6qQzNvlqWl/fi23QxF2VNN1lJiWpx
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzalLvXUIHr8XFOl73R4w+1WD18nMzVJLIb3zfE6I5o9tO76rBLBE+XiN4IgbySMYF2wwwdh2xTur0QdnWlvT8=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:22cb:b0:453:6438:5bfa with SMTP id
g11-20020a05651222cb00b0045364385bfamr13634534lfu.308.1649453659571; Fri, 08
Apr 2022 14:34:19 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Erik Aronesty <erik@q32.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2022 17:34:07 -0400
Message-ID: <CAJowKg+xgenKmyA7gHPmPV0VNF-PdAww2nAxBfS-Z7v5GcpeLA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000073cb4c05dc2b5bfd"
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 08 Apr 2022 21:36:05 +0000
Subject: [bitcoin-dev] Simple step one for quantum
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2022 21:34:23 -0000
--00000000000073cb4c05dc2b5bfd
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
First step could be just implementing a similar address type
(secp26k1+NTRU) and associated validation as a soft fork
https://www.openssh.com/releasenotes.html#9.0
Then people can opt-in to quantum safe addresses
Still should work with schnorr and other things
It's a lot of work to fold this in and it's a some extra validation work
for nodes
Adding a fee premium for using these addresses in order to address that
concern seems reasonable
I'm not saying I endorse any action at all. Personally I think this is
putting the cart like six and a half miles in front of the horse.
But if there's a lot of people that are like yeah please do this, I'd be
happy to make an NTRU bip or something.
--00000000000073cb4c05dc2b5bfd
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<div dir=3D"auto"><div dir=3D"auto">First step could be just implementing a=
similar address type (secp26k1+NTRU) and associated validation as a soft f=
ork=C2=A0</div><div dir=3D"auto"><br></div><a href=3D"https://www.openssh.c=
om/releasenotes.html#9.0" target=3D"_blank" rel=3D"noreferrer">https://www.=
openssh.com/releasenotes.html#9.0</a><div dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div dir=
=3D"auto">Then people can opt-in to quantum safe addresses</div><div dir=3D=
"auto"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto">Still should work with schnorr and other=
things</div><div dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto">It's a lot o=
f work to fold this in and it's a some extra validation work for nodes<=
/div><div dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto">Adding a fee premium for=
using these addresses in order to address that concern seems reasonable</d=
iv><div dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto">I'm not saying I endor=
se any action at all.=C2=A0 Personally I think this is putting the cart lik=
e six and a half miles in front of the horse.</div><div dir=3D"auto"><br></=
div><div dir=3D"auto">But if there's a lot of people that are like yeah=
please do this, I'd be happy to make an NTRU bip or something.</div><d=
iv dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto"><br=
></div><div dir=3D"auto"><br></div></div>
--00000000000073cb4c05dc2b5bfd--
|
