1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
|
Return-Path: <el33th4x0r@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 877E31031
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sun, 27 Dec 2015 04:33:46 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-qg0-f51.google.com (mail-qg0-f51.google.com
[209.85.192.51])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E01E4A7
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sun, 27 Dec 2015 04:33:45 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-qg0-f51.google.com with SMTP id 6so51594428qgy.1
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sat, 26 Dec 2015 20:33:45 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
:content-type; bh=H8iHkKwRhHmQwCrip/18hrqOWoolZ/l3ybxZPNxaC9M=;
b=CAfRMSLBKoe+o5MbmT9ZIr5du+l7KNO+5ZGNUV1L8tDAHBuOKPadTfs6zpOxSr2Jgb
80EPpg8vJ1uHZSqaFmm4GT24KtwA8tczJi7Sp9EJe4agqWysQExnpOw1fi52LdgP3Wod
BbGjha3a9uT2iabBDWhmOGyRY8cp6MxwJqK/8R16NgVh5+4JIqsRbSAaCudFJ1CFUmwi
lfH7UawRS/wCpTtZwhyLbPXbuxDyh6VL8tAW1WI7bfCVICNRBQTDljmV8QSVvGiMoZ4Z
acd7GwqZk76ZyJkJ/335E82eW2OGFOIhQJbN2XG+lCYKqkKpJzTvROnB/WLFF2lNMSv5
ZyIw==
X-Received: by 10.140.80.166 with SMTP id c35mr62598694qgd.20.1451190825185;
Sat, 26 Dec 2015 20:33:45 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.140.29.73 with HTTP; Sat, 26 Dec 2015 20:33:25 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CCA40088-E9CE-4EC0-9C3A-E355A6C3389F@toom.im>
References: <ema8a70574-c28e-4c43-a1e3-5f2f4df7d3a2@platinum>
<CCA40088-E9CE-4EC0-9C3A-E355A6C3389F@toom.im>
From: =?UTF-8?Q?Emin_G=C3=BCn_Sirer?= <el33th4x0r@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2015 23:33:25 -0500
Message-ID: <CAPkFh0t6uVK4Z9C+mpwNAyy+iR4YJmjS48PDAAsVAXVjfQL9cg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c135d4a2fb680527d9b18c
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] We need to fix the block withholding attack
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Dec 2015 04:33:46 -0000
--001a11c135d4a2fb680527d9b18c
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>Another option for how to deal with block withholding attacks: Give the
miner who finds the block a bonus.
...
>This must have been proposed before, right? Anyone know of a good analysis
of the game theory math?
Yes, Section 8.D. in Ittay's paper discusses this countermeasure, as well
as a few others:
https://www.cs.cornell.edu/~ie53/publications/btcPoolsSP15.pdf
- egs
--001a11c135d4a2fb680527d9b18c
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<div dir=3D"ltr"><div>>Another option for how to deal with block withhol=
ding attacks: Give the miner who finds the block a bonus.</div><div>...</di=
v><div>>This must have been proposed before, right? Anyone know of a goo=
d analysis of the game theory math?</div><div><br></div>Yes, Section 8.D. i=
n Ittay's paper discusses=C2=A0this countermeasure, as well as a few ot=
hers:<div><div>=C2=A0 =C2=A0=C2=A0<a href=3D"https://www.cs.cornell.edu/~ie=
53/publications/btcPoolsSP15.pdf" target=3D"_blank">https://www.cs.cornell.=
edu/~ie53/publications/btcPoolsSP15.pdf</a><br></div></div><div><br></div><=
div>- egs<br></div><div><br></div></div>
--001a11c135d4a2fb680527d9b18c--
|
