1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
|
Return-Path: <jtimon@jtimon.cc>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5781B1C76
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Mon, 5 Oct 2015 13:29:21 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-wi0-f169.google.com (mail-wi0-f169.google.com
[209.85.212.169])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A735729B
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Mon, 5 Oct 2015 13:29:20 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by wicfx3 with SMTP id fx3so119978160wic.1
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Mon, 05 Oct 2015 06:29:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type;
bh=EtRfhYgDzqniGSlTtqRJQuDwDfRSkFMF1d0931+gUsc=;
b=WOi9HsP+bSr8ALghUWmr6zxp8bogEA8lwnIS0RzZdGakmYXF80KQ0ykRkMQlfZtTWK
bsnZjdVdZBkRk6bzSkBeWD3X3bPinWoJIKU6kHwPjLapSODEjz/Tcs7TTU9V9jS59uPO
0XQUGxEMkHNfJe7ntR/qpq+/g6S4YBf48nqO2XtWAPulmGd2+8Mk8m1K9bdIreuNpwXd
wM2OFPV6JY+xKzI8GzX9yST0fJrjO02c5/FXI4zu9nGWYmXlf/++kNJOxSQb8zO3M+h+
+HUuW770buwzYfIvK4oVrnL4hIV/+mfciJdlzEFPMarRSPYCSSbaKB+5OF/zCEha/fFX
W3TQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkTzRgxvSvvtZgZH3e7TIyQF8PTOD+ZFKd2rjzqo5UofLKRPq8PmlYCNND2ziV/ZoIlfVxu
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.186.98 with SMTP id fj2mr12535591wic.58.1444051759324;
Mon, 05 Oct 2015 06:29:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.194.114.199 with HTTP; Mon, 5 Oct 2015 06:29:19 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <BLU436-SMTP132FA09C343ACB7C82E6C98C64B0@phx.gbl>
References: <CAKfs=Z_jVKtjeSHM1a6n+ch6WcazkshmDgN4Wi1K_kLBUE4o4w@mail.gmail.com>
<BLU436-SMTP132FA09C343ACB7C82E6C98C64B0@phx.gbl>
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2015 15:29:19 +0200
Message-ID: <CABm2gDqFbm4A2R7whQbCDxXKjvkdTmTKU2HV3+E+8c9EPdtnTw@mail.gmail.com>
From: =?UTF-8?B?Sm9yZ2UgVGltw7Nu?= <jtimon@jtimon.cc>
To: GC <slashdevnull@hotmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Let's deploy BIP65 CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY!
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2015 13:29:21 -0000
On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 4:12 AM, GC via bitcoin-dev
<bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> Or, you know, enter some discussions on what exactly are the issues that SPV
> clients face during soft forks and see if anything can be done (on all
> sides) to mitigate the risks.
This has already been discussed. The recommended risk mitigation
mechanism for softforks it's just the same as the one for hardforks:
unknown block version notifications.
|
