summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/ef/ddc8e35af319c7b156a717643f64e87d0cef73
blob: eaf57f458f9e967db1ecc0258665f4ae0f8a648a (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
Received: from sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.193]
	helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
	by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <pete@petertodd.org>) id 1UPWQY-0008BY-Dj
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Tue, 09 Apr 2013 11:09:26 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of petertodd.org
	designates 62.13.148.111 as permitted sender)
	client-ip=62.13.148.111; envelope-from=pete@petertodd.org;
	helo=outmail148111.authsmtp.net; 
Received: from outmail148111.authsmtp.net ([62.13.148.111])
	by sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	id 1UPWQW-0001vq-Jg for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Tue, 09 Apr 2013 11:09:26 +0000
Received: from mail-c233.authsmtp.com (mail-c233.authsmtp.com [62.13.128.233])
	by punt8.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/Kp) with ESMTP id
	r39B9GgN085039; Tue, 9 Apr 2013 12:09:16 +0100 (BST)
Received: from savin (76-10-178-109.dsl.teksavvy.com [76.10.178.109])
	(authenticated bits=128)
	by mail.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/) with ESMTP id r39B9CUE000809
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO);
	Tue, 9 Apr 2013 12:09:14 +0100 (BST)
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2013 07:09:11 -0400
From: Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org>
To: Mike Hearn <mike@plan99.net>
Message-ID: <20130409110911.GA25700@savin>
References: <CA+8xBpc5iV=prakWKkNFa0O+tgyhoHxJ9Xwz6ubhPRUBf_95KA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CANEZrP1EKaHbpdC6X=9mvyJHC_cvW7u5p9nqM7EwkEypAg4Xmg@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="6TrnltStXW4iwmi0"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CANEZrP1EKaHbpdC6X=9mvyJHC_cvW7u5p9nqM7EwkEypAg4Xmg@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
X-Server-Quench: ea72c73b-a105-11e2-a49c-0025907707a1
X-AuthReport-Spam: If SPAM / abuse - report it at:
	http://www.authsmtp.com/abuse
X-AuthRoute: OCd2Yg0TA1ZNQRgX IjsJECJaVQIpKltL GxAVKBZePFsRUQkR
	aQdMdgsUGUUGAgsB AmUbWlZeUFR7WGY7 bAxPbAVDY01GQQRq
	WVdMSlVNFUsqAhVz D217Jxlydw1GcTB4 YE9gECUKW0YpckUv
	Xx9VFWgbZGY1an1O VEkLagNUcgZDfhhC alcuVT1vNG8XDQg5
	AwQ0PjZ0MThBJSBS WgQAK04nCWENWzE7 RhYNVTkmAURNXD06 KnQA
X-Authentic-SMTP: 61633532353630.1021:706
X-AuthFastPath: 0 (Was 255)
X-AuthSMTP-Origin: 76.10.178.109/587
X-AuthVirus-Status: No virus detected - but ensure you scan with your own
	anti-virus system.
X-Spam-Score: -1.5 (-)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
	See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
	-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
	sender-domain
	-0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
X-Headers-End: 1UPWQW-0001vq-Jg
Cc: Bitcoin Development <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] On-going data spam
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2013 11:09:26 -0000


--6TrnltStXW4iwmi0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 12:42:12PM +0200, Mike Hearn wrote:
> hack by changing the protocol. Nodes can serve up blocks encrypted under a
> random key. You only get the key when you finish the download. A blacklist

NAK

Makes bringing up a new node dependent on other nodes having consistent
uptimes, particularly if you are on a low-bandwidth connection.

> can apply to Bloom filtering such that transactions which are known to be
> "abusive" require you to fully download the block rather than select the
> transactions with a filter. This means that people can still access the

NAK

No blacklists

--=20
'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org

--6TrnltStXW4iwmi0
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJRY/bXAAoJEH+rEUJn5PoE6YsH/1038k+EQc1Y61Sx9Db8HIgk
sfu9wMkEO65dpxB703S8X2T+RL24bWOnx6pWCCt+nQU7/c+7ulOV49VID50ECa2k
2VDqF7N/+2nUseZoTag0jGzfcYlASqcx/KcsZM/MjCJ9X/lnjS3kXVo4Cr6gmYOK
oZBMyPYYMFHJnnJT1IfoX1D+zGuPrEEYSaU72rd/uoH1GrDdqPxAe0H0+Kw3Q3x+
LrQZnEs3QQo+SELMXwJNKN8ZKdmnnj4jWEgUkSs6HK4Tu50zF7xMsZvC2Prt1d+8
jWN/05A3YZTMNf3QRe7ME8AMG3vKTNyh+SKm4RavvfLf8m6yRZ9wNuWxEJZDogk=
=der3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--6TrnltStXW4iwmi0--