1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
|
Return-Path: <prabhatkr@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1521BEB3
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Thu, 27 Aug 2015 17:33:41 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-ob0-f170.google.com (mail-ob0-f170.google.com
[209.85.214.170])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F216F170
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Thu, 27 Aug 2015 17:33:39 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by obbwr7 with SMTP id wr7so22290159obb.2
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Thu, 27 Aug 2015 10:33:39 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
:cc:content-type;
bh=hqOlDs+NcMOoZkgm8QOqDC7QM53Q9zFf12fk0qO5Gdk=;
b=GfPZKLws5yaUNELJ+Ya7so2R1MjPsYGn5FLUYR/htlcerfe5qI8JMhQ0dcmbgs9IE4
U55ZYJjjrlr4rihIzETEKCChUC78UXSfatQVRpVmsWJZnPd5AQSgtwImSMgOeFyZU67J
gI6uyaLUFghBDuo6bYKKWM+VXNJr9/52bzY/M+9rIgb9zbmcuW2v6Lgzq8za7QkMXlYI
xRPlsuYkPTv+OTwxWqHSeJ8suS65Bz66cxdapOGGpWzUwDitOQMmziW9jYgiXVEDZ4Db
79VHpCIxcYwPJUiVkZzIROJag5y0VFy6clFP9wZqvVvzYuELly2MpalbJwS9EhmE6oZ9
O0Rg==
X-Received: by 10.182.210.194 with SMTP id mw2mr3170305obc.59.1440696819322;
Thu, 27 Aug 2015 10:33:39 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.202.45.214 with HTTP; Thu, 27 Aug 2015 10:33:19 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CABsx9T0BCkYqN2s0t0wvAFVOfXWiUb-zUL0FseN4yDp5CjtD3g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CALoZ_LG7POrwNqtG9prvG_1T3+OcWNo9cKbiwHDu9xP85zqOEA@mail.gmail.com>
<CAC0TF==iEPzMpjcGO+ukV6rVkM-4yH3jX0Obu4Aint1eWzK5bQ@mail.gmail.com>
<CALoZ_LE4eWO6NaP2nR4PsRBP8p_u1uhgs1PSMo7hiVf_e2=CvA@mail.gmail.com>
<fcbeee9eacd7a58b950f965eb1450180@xbt.hk>
<CALoZ_LHU7LDywjiNX53Z=5i4fkiLbRwBpCwpzTB0beWW=UHN8w@mail.gmail.com>
<CABsx9T06Pot0QqZ9bbok6_FH5kyDh+-QV=fdUGma=cmr=iESsg@mail.gmail.com>
<CALoZ_LF_2pbczmHm5ZGc4=ffDqTmcoAYZzkFTUUV9a05q6wTfQ@mail.gmail.com>
<CABsx9T0BCkYqN2s0t0wvAFVOfXWiUb-zUL0FseN4yDp5CjtD3g@mail.gmail.com>
From: prabhat <prabhatkr@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2015 23:03:19 +0530
Message-ID: <CALoZ_LGt68K+rqSzP1_ge+-pkn6wxhdpHHDs8pris6_pQQHR7g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Gavin Andresen <gavinandresen@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c22f122519df051e4e5eab
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIPS proposal for implementing AML-KYC in bitcoin
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2015 17:33:41 -0000
--001a11c22f122519df051e4e5eab
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
So you mean that,
1. Govt agencies already know about everything and anything this subject
is about, but passively.
2. Due to passive nature, the actions are post incident and not pre. So
there is a risk of many ticking time-bombs which some JB (Jack Bauer or
James Bond or Jai Singh Rathore) would diffuse. Sorry for being dramatic,
the purpose is to make the point, and nothing else.
3. The subjected proposal doesn't breach the decentralisation, but just
not like swiss democracy.
I am not a legal expert, but know this much that there are 2 kinds of
crimes, one against liberty and other against life. Most of online privacy
advocacy is for liberty. But money is attached to life and not liberty. So
this has to change. It means life for many and many depend on it.
And the appeal is, Let us get active.
PS: I do not own much of bitcoins to be an advocate, but many others do and
any mayhem would affect me somehow, even if in farthest of world.
Best,
Prabhat Kumar Singh
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 7:18 PM, Gavin Andresen <gavinandresen@gmail.com>
wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 9:39 AM, prabhat <prabhatkr@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> So where is the solution? What to do?
>>
>
> This is a development list; organizations like https://coincenter.org/
> work on high-level policy issues.
>
> Last I heard, competent law enforcement organizations said they were
> perfectly capable of tracking down criminals using Bitcoin using
> traditional investigative techniques (like infiltrating criminal
> organizations or setting up honeypots). Given how many "dark markets" have
> either disappeared or been taken down, it seems they are correct.
>
> --
> --
> Gavin Andresen
>
--001a11c22f122519df051e4e5eab
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<div dir=3D"ltr">So you mean that,<div><ol><li>Govt agencies already know a=
bout everything and anything this subject is about, but passively.</li><li>=
Due to passive nature, the actions are post incident and not pre. So there =
is a risk of many ticking time-bombs which some JB (Jack Bauer or James Bon=
d or Jai Singh Rathore) would diffuse. Sorry for being dramatic, the purpos=
e is to make the point, and nothing else.</li><li>The subjected proposal do=
esn't breach the decentralisation, but just not like swiss democracy.</=
li></ol><div>I am not a legal expert, but know this much that there are 2 k=
inds of crimes, one against liberty and other against life. Most of online =
privacy advocacy is for liberty. But money is attached to life and not libe=
rty. So this has to change. It means life for many and many depend on it.</=
div></div><div><br></div><div>And the appeal is, Let us get active.</div><d=
iv><br></div><div>PS: I do not own much of bitcoins to be an advocate, but =
many others do and any mayhem would affect me somehow, even if in farthest =
of world.</div><div><br></div><div>Best,</div></div><div class=3D"gmail_ext=
ra"><br clear=3D"all"><div><div class=3D"gmail_signature">Prabhat Kumar Sin=
gh<br><br></div></div>
<br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 7:18 PM, Gavin Andre=
sen <span dir=3D"ltr"><<a href=3D"mailto:gavinandresen@gmail.com" target=
=3D"_blank">gavinandresen@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote cl=
ass=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;p=
adding-left:1ex"><div dir=3D"ltr"><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><div class=3D"=
gmail_quote"><span class=3D"">On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 9:39 AM, prabhat <spa=
n dir=3D"ltr"><<a href=3D"mailto:prabhatkr@gmail.com" target=3D"_blank">=
prabhatkr@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quo=
te" style=3D"margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-col=
or:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex"><span><div di=
r=3D"ltr"><div dir=3D"ltr" style=3D"font-size:12.8000001907349px"><div>So w=
here is the solution? What to do?</div></div></div></span></blockquote><div=
><br></div></span><div>This is a development list; organizations like=C2=A0=
<a href=3D"https://coincenter.org/" target=3D"_blank">https://coincenter.or=
g/</a> work on high-level policy issues.</div><div><br></div><div>Last I he=
ard, competent law enforcement organizations said they were perfectly capab=
le of tracking down criminals using Bitcoin using traditional investigative=
techniques (like infiltrating criminal organizations or setting up honeypo=
ts). Given how many "dark markets" have either disappeared or bee=
n taken down, it seems they are correct.</div></div><span class=3D"HOEnZb">=
<font color=3D"#888888"><div><br></div>-- <br><div>--<br>Gavin Andresen<br>=
</div>
</font></span></div></div>
</blockquote></div><br></div>
--001a11c22f122519df051e4e5eab--
|
