summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/ee/50fad4fafa171e870191438427beeb96388cf8
blob: 3935d04a518ef0d674053aef8877673e51e5e9f5 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
Return-Path: <karljohan-alm@garage.co.jp>
Received: from whitealder.osuosl.org (smtp1.osuosl.org [140.211.166.138])
 by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E29BDC0051
 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
 Mon,  2 Nov 2020 12:12:06 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by whitealder.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0DC9868E4
 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
 Mon,  2 Nov 2020 12:12:06 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org
Received: from whitealder.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id 4B6AggYLmJ4Y
 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
 Mon,  2 Nov 2020 12:12:05 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mta41.mta.hdems.com (mta41.mta.hdems.com [18.179.48.80])
 by whitealder.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5FA4986684
 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
 Mon,  2 Nov 2020 12:12:05 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mo.hdems.com (unknown [10.5.20.170])
 by mta41.mta.hdems.com ('HDEMS') with ESMTPSA id 4CPsGp32Lgz2K1r95
 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
 Mon,  2 Nov 2020 12:12:02 +0000 (UTC)
X-HDEMS-MO-TENANT: garage.co.jp
Received: from mail-lf1-f72.google.com (mail-lf1-f72.google.com.
 [209.85.167.72]) by gwsmtp.prod.mo.hdems.com with ESMTPS id
 gwsmtpd-trans-1535949b-c00a-47b3-a7ba-b929c0de9d74
 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
 Mon, 02 Nov 2020 12:12:00 +0000
Received: by mail-lf1-f72.google.com with SMTP id y14so1995867lfl.7
 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
 Mon, 02 Nov 2020 04:11:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
 :message-id:subject:to:content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=exWsm7h7RqltcloCIkyQmAm4koiT+XgHYqPD1X90H5g=;
 b=H9DY34yIsFYXhyoGzaXV5T+lu+UvzcEE8Ys7lgsuNqJrQgIhZctWlHqLMUV1gE87wv
 ziJGaoxQyAxiqDoHpoWEGgNY4YGHPaYU8dQ8UjYTk3jvH3xlpPi5sBHvQdzSArcCaQrK
 WAm+P7W9Rtiu2QCOrSuS3E9f7pRYn4gY2Om9Bd40QjCbeFctTmEgDumpzps+0AWRv+0z
 hgCQRgHMHqszwkBsbBHgW80E0qJZfu/RIXG0nOwwkzrL9kyIqP41zcOSmezvevNhVPu9
 8jb0K7LJvGin5Ts6iNVjGTRkN14BuCHlh3tkOGg+X2Rgn3vzjWWqE1VfynRmLb0fHa+o
 NJSQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533vQJxv56VGINXFxRa5K4FKu0CVlb6fGluABUKhvwYgFXkI3XXK
 1OjZNsBF784i9JC3qM420i3Cm3RuQnQjaKqmsbSN6L7IkCe3+PUdKjab57op2ShAjF8GxktFWXP
 PE9rrXfIUUP5wAEn6z35V0QMczUMWBUfrxSsBzTMcSQhK9+dSzMVzdSi7hwRRBRn+BKzWAGVjpl
 7trmM4RefoGgIsEMHos03aOvhOQcMlHLZ/VUEUhYkGjZ7Cg0z0QlJhhqitWmql5muhDKqcVC0Te
 c0Cmp1jt3ENhloplpGx/1FD4p87Iw6WhRYdnS3tiKiZT3qtLpSu5cLcP098EqRKtsiAvcbxkbw9
 wOWLLxO6bjyqU+WkHUvlQ9McFmNZ
X-Received: by 2002:ac2:5973:: with SMTP id h19mr5334396lfp.458.1604319117005; 
 Mon, 02 Nov 2020 04:11:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwZlYuTTWwdLoUjyR/CMwk4REo/RkojogtI0DMblOlFBOq4O2yaudFsfSOOcUw2XpBZH2Pd5J9vqLhElUF1us4=
X-Received: by 2002:ac2:5973:: with SMTP id h19mr5334386lfp.458.1604319116631; 
 Mon, 02 Nov 2020 04:11:56 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CALJw2w5bvLFeBAdWs=zQhR+hTcXqV18ntV3+tC-DzBuzCWPTOg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CALJw2w5bvLFeBAdWs=zQhR+hTcXqV18ntV3+tC-DzBuzCWPTOg@mail.gmail.com>
From: =?UTF-8?B?44Ki44Or44Og44CA44Kr44O844Or44Oo44OP44Oz?= <karl@dglab.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2020 21:11:40 +0900
Message-ID: <CALJw2w4fA_QyjdE9KX7thh2gB13BqZ701g311GPeCyQGG3AvhQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] RFC BIP-0002: Defer, not reject.
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>, 
 <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>, 
 <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Nov 2020 12:12:07 -0000

Follow-up to this: there is now an alternative to this which proposes
that the rejection criteria in BIP 2 is updated to require there to be
an actual concern. This is here:
https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/1016

Please nod or something at either or both of them.

On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 7:06 PM =E3=82=A2=E3=83=AB=E3=83=A0=E3=80=80=E3=82=
=AB=E3=83=BC=E3=83=AB=E3=83=A8=E3=83=8F=E3=83=B3 <karl@dglab.com> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I am making a minor proposed change to BIP-0002
>
> https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/1012
>
> I propose that we change the 3-year-rule to allow anyone to change the
> status of a BIP to "Deferred", rather than "Rejected".
>
> Rejecting a BIP already has ambiguous meaning in BIP-0002 as it
> stands, with "hard" rejects:
>
> > The BIP editor will not unreasonably reject a BIP. Reasons for rejectin=
g BIPs include duplication of effort, disregard for formatting rules, being=
 too unfocused or too broad, being technically unsound, not providing prope=
r motivation or addressing backwards compatibility, or not in keeping with =
the Bitcoin philosophy.
>
> and "soft" rejects:
>
> > BIPs should be changed from Draft or Proposed status, to Rejected statu=
s, upon request by any person, if they have not made progress in three year=
s. Such a BIP may be changed to Draft status if the champion provides revis=
ions that meaningfully address public criticism of the proposal, or to Prop=
osed status if it meets the criteria required as described in the previous =
paragraph.
>
> My proposal is that we disambiguate the second into "deferred" instead.
>
> Alternatively, we add a new status e.g. "Inactive".