blob: 9c5b442b501356b7e2f65edad712a63a244e66ad (
plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
|
Received: from sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.193]
helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
by sfs-ml-1.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
(envelope-from <mh.in.england@gmail.com>) id 1Z3TdR-0003fJ-FC
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Fri, 12 Jun 2015 18:24:57 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com
designates 209.85.212.177 as permitted sender)
client-ip=209.85.212.177; envelope-from=mh.in.england@gmail.com;
helo=mail-wi0-f177.google.com;
Received: from mail-wi0-f177.google.com ([209.85.212.177])
by sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
(Exim 4.76) id 1Z3TdQ-00047I-FZ
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Fri, 12 Jun 2015 18:24:57 +0000
Received: by wibdq8 with SMTP id dq8so24196216wib.1
for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
Fri, 12 Jun 2015 11:24:50 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.9.161 with SMTP id a1mr28897979wjb.39.1434133490431;
Fri, 12 Jun 2015 11:24:50 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: mh.in.england@gmail.com
Received: by 10.194.16.40 with HTTP; Fri, 12 Jun 2015 11:24:50 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAPg+sBi5fYHGLv4wtWbWE7jov8CX=q9UX=vhxDVepG6JfX30+g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAPg+sBi5fYHGLv4wtWbWE7jov8CX=q9UX=vhxDVepG6JfX30+g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2015 20:24:50 +0200
X-Google-Sender-Auth: h3KWg-EKpCCdB46NdleJc1pQf10
Message-ID: <CANEZrP3=uM-d7zKcCW=YJnrgNBk3dCvSk8OhdUzR1g3m_ktBpw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Mike Hearn <mike@plan99.net>
To: Pieter Wuille <pieter.wuille@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b5d34fa41ff8a05185639ed
X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
sender-domain
0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
(mh.in.england[at]gmail.com)
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
1.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
not necessarily valid
-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
X-Headers-End: 1Z3TdQ-00047I-FZ
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Mining centralization pressure from
non-uniform propagation speed
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2015 18:24:57 -0000
--047d7b5d34fa41ff8a05185639ed
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
> are only connected to each other through a slow 2 Mbit/s link.
>
That's very slow indeed. For comparison, plain old 3G connections routinely
cruise around 7-8 Mbit/sec.
So this simulation is assuming a speed dramatically worse than a mobile
phone can get!
--047d7b5d34fa41ff8a05185639ed
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<div dir=3D"ltr"><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><div class=3D"gmail_quote"><blo=
ckquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #c=
cc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir=3D"ltr"><div><div><div>are only connect=
ed to each other through a slow 2 Mbit/s link.<br></div></div></div></div><=
/blockquote><div><br></div><div>That's very slow indeed. For comparison=
, plain old 3G connections routinely cruise around 7-8 Mbit/sec.</div><div>=
<br></div><div>So this simulation is assuming a speed dramatically worse th=
an a mobile phone can get!</div></div></div></div>
--047d7b5d34fa41ff8a05185639ed--
|
