1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
|
Return-Path: <btcdrak@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2692211A9
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Thu, 1 Oct 2015 09:18:14 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-wi0-f170.google.com (mail-wi0-f170.google.com
[209.85.212.170])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9D1F1256
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Thu, 1 Oct 2015 09:18:13 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by wicge5 with SMTP id ge5so19974429wic.0
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Thu, 01 Oct 2015 02:18:12 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
:cc:content-type;
bh=jekp3lcKVNtivVNCqKtePvdLVyjoMrV7VvB1qj5wF3g=;
b=gmSjlWWo2TtUha/GlCSs0lVEO6RfSddRdniplwzMCOb1dcWg3WKgIhszTVc9GMBjCv
GYkvH63qrrN9MdWzOX7kRIHfNB2T1AxfAgId1A6KOdMWniizlwUUaeQboCXYAuViPoU+
yDbaHx4J8xp4XqKfBTrOqeLf+I8gmpXnECwAPFT8nPn6xPQHjJEebrJGK1LFss1XeFim
PppYG5RZG65CmD3wU1B6QsT6eOdTjcEZUx/U6jUUqlihGRZOZSes+EHLQx2cgiJkPLSc
Lgh39vovpC1a/z4ceR/gn/X6cccfCEOTjyXGYkYMSEN5sOsCFEIrMKyERfe4VXufkshC
3qNw==
X-Received: by 10.194.204.195 with SMTP id la3mr8986166wjc.77.1443691092270;
Thu, 01 Oct 2015 02:18:12 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.28.21.200 with HTTP; Thu, 1 Oct 2015 02:17:52 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAAUq486=TisNp0MbFjWYdCsyVX-qx5dV_KKZuNR7Jp63KNWeiQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20150924112555.GA21355@amethyst.visucore.com>
<201509301757.44035.luke@dashjr.org>
<20151001085058.GA10010@amethyst.visucore.com>
<CAAUq486=TisNp0MbFjWYdCsyVX-qx5dV_KKZuNR7Jp63KNWeiQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Btc Drak <btcdrak@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2015 10:17:52 +0100
Message-ID: <CADJgMzuDPoQacdrH7n_ajwuYLMZ4-Z19KZSa=w=rLhmOkJhfQg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Marcel Jamin <marcel@jamin.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bae4462b86325052107864a
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, HK_RANDOM_ENVFROM,
HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Cc: Bitcoin development mailing list <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Bitcoin Core 0.12.0 release schedule
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2015 09:18:14 -0000
--047d7bae4462b86325052107864a
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 10:05 AM, Marcel Jamin via bitcoin-dev <
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> Any particular reason bitcoin versioning doesn't follow the SemVer spec?
>
We do: a.b.c, the next major version is, 0.12.0, and maintenance releases
are 0.12.1 etc. Release candidates are 0.12.0-rc1 for example.
--047d7bae4462b86325052107864a
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<div dir=3D"ltr"><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On T=
hu, Oct 1, 2015 at 10:05 AM, Marcel Jamin via bitcoin-dev <span dir=3D"ltr"=
><<a href=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org" target=3D"_bl=
ank">bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockq=
uote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc =
solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir=3D"ltr">Any particular reason bitcoin vers=
ioning doesn't follow the SemVer spec?</div></blockquote><div><br></div=
><div>We do: a.b.c, the next major version is, 0.12.0, and maintenance rele=
ases are 0.12.1 etc. Release candidates are 0.12.0-rc1 for example.</div></=
div></div></div>
--047d7bae4462b86325052107864a--
|
