1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
|
Return-Path: <tier.nolan@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A72ECBE0
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 18 Apr 2017 13:07:10 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-oi0-f48.google.com (mail-oi0-f48.google.com
[209.85.218.48])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4A1011EF
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 18 Apr 2017 13:07:10 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-oi0-f48.google.com with SMTP id x184so88048503oia.1
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 18 Apr 2017 06:07:10 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:cc;
bh=Snu4VN4OZB7rMU2+cmgkclawYI17OyFH+F9pZlzf8ps=;
b=UvMRAAPjjBiqqZ7sDfs6PligOmYL3hOBhR3TbGXXayO1E3mgQ+MHGYB6qy+QjJ9KQk
3hONt6nQiO3rne8e9vSTM+B+wo5RGTsK7QYQjJY3plhA5eUbtST6uk2ePwJUTfc9qyPh
BvnHgk8yrWUP5bEJdPR2PhD1mDAIYWpfIYCmq7vAfX7Xa+sXdudKqPmm+kmgWbBTRUta
0r1prTNeQVr37DCThQO5AFxooDjCQNrIh0ANpbkmEgvQVEVWnl8veoUz2LVZe/2T2haq
9gWDf36CTzQT0CR31KWi0Jrp0/WQ+pTQ2u8cQBFStgGWmeG7FJKzqgKqJo+b8DyW5Gik
JdGw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
:message-id:subject:cc;
bh=Snu4VN4OZB7rMU2+cmgkclawYI17OyFH+F9pZlzf8ps=;
b=sM7VaGaVrqLPK9qbwRBMF6TjsjripsrbLNVNssMO7Hx/bT2ixhEZAttH/XA6dBvRJt
vZ60bQtk1eD6zWzqr+feTSuCGFs17S4/WYuB7ef4REsY/76EALZifHLIoxd2i0sAH4Ut
6Vt5k8ZPzYu0r5VqwMZyVbyZmwyE7AUGUtRaRemGRWsSzRodS3JkbqNTSzaWMj0wvIsd
WM6Ag3d0HgUyxt5CEAvEOMlR1q8gQ+WsUd3a6U1a9CPsZaYYjJ1/gTaENkRn8Y/YWIb1
p7O1dWx/E4CoyM/Ux/0Lba6WysIJOtlPnICdZZc31QF14PMqsvxtKgRH+54cFAENFY+V
zr5A==
X-Gm-Message-State: AN3rC/5RWRQN00pkaal20YvS82Bf/2VEmWS8z0DLCeJN3e+PM8nlU5Vc
Oc7N32ujfD37G+Rr2/vBCDQCeeMObQz3
X-Received: by 10.157.45.56 with SMTP id v53mr7015287ota.134.1492520829452;
Tue, 18 Apr 2017 06:07:09 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.74.139.207 with HTTP; Tue, 18 Apr 2017 06:07:09 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <2226058.Q8lHjYE4Pt@strawberry>
References: <CAFVRnypbQQ-vsSLqv48cYaqTCty4R1DmFRqfAvxe4mAqyQNXxQ@mail.gmail.com>
<2226058.Q8lHjYE4Pt@strawberry>
From: Tier Nolan <tier.nolan@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2017 14:07:09 +0100
Message-ID: <CAE-z3OVXLKqyBb3R5yzOYdnRALot4KUhJ53r9y2jXkf6Yt=KnA@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113d07e8dc09eb054d709554
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,MISSING_HEADERS,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM autolearn=no version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Small Nodes: A Better Alternative to Pruned Nodes
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2017 13:07:10 -0000
--001a113d07e8dc09eb054d709554
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
This has been discussed before.
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2015-May/008101.html
including a list of nice to have features by Maxwell
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2015-May/008110.html
You meet most of these rules, though you do have to download blocks from
multiple peers.
The suggestion in that thread were for a way to compactly indicate which
blocks a node has. Each node would then store a sub-set of all the
blocks. You just download the blocks you want from the node that has them.
Each node would be recommended to store the last few days worth anyway.
--001a113d07e8dc09eb054d709554
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<div dir=3D"ltr"><div><div><div><div><div><div><div>This has been discussed=
before.<br><br><a href=3D"https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitc=
oin-dev/2015-May/008101.html">https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/b=
itcoin-dev/2015-May/008101.html</a><br><br></div>including a list of nice t=
o have features by Maxwell<br><br><a href=3D"https://lists.linuxfoundation.=
org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2015-May/008110.html">https://lists.linuxfoundati=
on.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2015-May/008110.html</a><br><br></div></div></=
div></div>You meet most of these rules, though you do have to download bloc=
ks from multiple peers.<br><br></div>The suggestion in that thread were for=
a way to compactly indicate which blocks a node has.=C2=A0 Each node would=
then store a sub-set of all the blocks.=C2=A0 You just download the blocks=
you want from the node that has them.<br><br></div>Each node would be reco=
mmended to store the last few days worth anyway.<br></div>
--001a113d07e8dc09eb054d709554--
|
