1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
|
Return-Path: <karra.etc@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7A5C5722
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Wed, 29 Jul 2015 17:30:09 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-pa0-f41.google.com (mail-pa0-f41.google.com
[209.85.220.41])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 16589202
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Wed, 29 Jul 2015 17:30:09 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by pabkd10 with SMTP id kd10so8920707pab.2
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Wed, 29 Jul 2015 10:30:08 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
:cc:content-type;
bh=cTJ3Ubo83BXoxXoqnTYheyJNbqtX47r0qlX3JodnvMg=;
b=EpupABEwXSjV1l2zKe9akhwn9rxNfbNReYPYzAKIBW+KWSMz5M38ZXta2mHaxL/y91
5RFDlPaN3Ej4mK9StTWC7JBbXIQOkeLSWreTX7338kwvSAFr+7m/1p09E86Fkpii4vg/
kX2Ip2GaDZ9QnZHzENJjjBxiUDwmxwElsRKNQ9Zz/x8VFL4pnVOI74B/Bzf+RZsI1J0x
kCSJpMyTIVzGdNrFqmoYRGFGzwJsCPMv+oMpH8MUP5D0sLyPO5mS+6pwa6UbhFJd4riu
8DLpPii3mRPthxIpxitMFHH2jO6Y8yFIVzzjStQOh3Z9MpCN2p8vOIJg15AriPzKblYo
mUGQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.66.65.205 with SMTP id z13mr95903002pas.65.1438191008788;
Wed, 29 Jul 2015 10:30:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.66.83.7 with HTTP; Wed, 29 Jul 2015 10:30:08 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAAS2fgSP7hBVx0GR=rA+nOzopip3ne47WmHJLD-+yViN+wRm4A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1B7F00D3-41AE-44BF-818D-EC4EF279DC11@gmail.com>
<CA+w+GKTfPXkVPaCC+3ZsQv=_DPMHoRwbigS40Testpyq4rZxsw@mail.gmail.com>
<CAAS2fgSP7hBVx0GR=rA+nOzopip3ne47WmHJLD-+yViN+wRm4A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2015 23:00:08 +0530
Message-ID: <CAFkt3UNoSnEkw8TcAPBQv+Fo2tfNsJfXFFO5jfz3o7G_EaY5nA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Sriram Karra <karra.etc@gmail.com>
To: Gregory Maxwell <gmaxwell@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11362f3a32bb89051c06f0c1
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Why Satoshi's temporary anti-spam measure isn't
temporary
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2015 17:30:09 -0000
--001a11362f3a32bb89051c06f0c1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 10:23 PM, Gregory Maxwell via bitcoin-dev <
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 9:59 AM, Mike Hearn via bitcoin-dev
>
>
> > Miners who don't validate have a habit of bleeding money: that's the
> > system working as designed.
>
> The information I have currently is that the parties engaging in that
> activity found it to be tremendously profitable, even including losses
> from issues.
Is there any shred of evidence either of you can share to support your
claims on this pivotal point of interest to everyone here?
--001a11362f3a32bb89051c06f0c1
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<div dir=3D"ltr"><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">=
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 10:23 PM, Gregory Maxwell via bitcoin-dev <span dir=
=3D"ltr"><<a href=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org" targe=
t=3D"_blank">bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org</a>></span> wrote:</d=
iv><div class=3D"gmail_quote"><br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=
=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span cl=
ass=3D"">On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 9:59 AM, Mike Hearn via bitcoin-dev<br></s=
pan><br>
<span class=3D""><br>
> Miners who don't validate have a habit of bleeding money:=C2=A0 =
=C2=A0that's the<br>
> system working as designed.<br>
<br>
</span>The information I have currently is that the parties engaging in tha=
t<br>
activity found it to be tremendously profitable, even including losses<br>
from issues.</blockquote><div><br></div><div>Is there any shred of evidence=
either of you can share to support your claims on this pivotal point of in=
terest to everyone here?=C2=A0</div></div></div></div>
--001a11362f3a32bb89051c06f0c1--
|
