1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
|
Return-Path: <tomh@thinlink.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1BA3C8CC
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 2 Sep 2016 17:10:42 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-pf0-f174.google.com (mail-pf0-f174.google.com
[209.85.192.174])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ADAAE17A
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 2 Sep 2016 17:10:41 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-pf0-f174.google.com with SMTP id g202so21081724pfb.0
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 02 Sep 2016 10:10:41 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=thinlink-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623;
h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version
:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=pEl7G3kFnmHqC1Y1wyNf4ZaQb6m22GKOHKBJYA/WUGM=;
b=JDsa2SO/YGDEOw6ccEDQe3Hbh2I90Ek84CNzLcECyCrtSUoR3Ca2PLgvd4udHR7Ray
bieCs23TcPoIC4T/YzW1CAaAR5wr/Rtqvvqd806u3y4zLo8hF85tLG8R63G3Xy/mTuQB
zbk0KEscbP9sRa5OrGM1zHjjgt216k+y+W+qz2DlIh1mUHfpyK2J+qqz1sIiAJaVnygu
C9jUEimrvifbBQVAzbD65+N3rs0qjq3C61KihCxb4aypCCz5HhmoNMpNsdGWZJjDDeVQ
GThRtRWvmaQjDXo0rSdXnfEDS9Q0p0VsjCIKRMQCBLD+YIXmQM49jO13O9n2IzNXnhGm
+ZBQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date
:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=pEl7G3kFnmHqC1Y1wyNf4ZaQb6m22GKOHKBJYA/WUGM=;
b=Ii+bg5kdPlk4mi6K8fDKY38VQhmwrF1mgKtzcIG3pwn33JlPk0Bof3kc7u4BcwZvcj
nBJMunymQedPJtNTv18DZmHPWwd70k4jmdb/8wbGziddJh4V2wqYDLJBaQEzsaW2betZ
EZlCOCAUCR5Yn0v2y0ZFKjCOydhGSvyqLuaLLRakk6J9ahKuqmAZkq5pmZx74I3p+Nxm
vOhIkmhhEUabLRZDatoSa5csdsNAv5PS4mCZQ18/sLL8DC3CygY0Jzo6WtH0nvLdtuWP
ws3LN76TrFS5B/gthkYoh+/Y5rrDrZWtFoXfCJZxUd61XKFkwZ/zmj239Hg8GOG4noa/
tMVA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwNgsCKaE/R3S76WlNHc3gvS2GBqb6Fkiqx+yn1UAxxuCKXS8E/JMbIhultXxFCwjUk2
X-Received: by 10.98.152.6 with SMTP id q6mr38094110pfd.86.1472836241101;
Fri, 02 Sep 2016 10:10:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.89] (99-8-65-117.lightspeed.davlca.sbcglobal.net.
[99.8.65.117]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id
7sm16228583pfk.6.2016.09.02.10.10.40
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
(version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
Fri, 02 Sep 2016 10:10:40 -0700 (PDT)
To: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
References: <1317364559.64256.1472791258452@privateemail.com>
From: Tom Harding <tomh@thinlink.com>
Message-ID: <198f7a5e-7912-dfb2-1b61-388a4f81b7b5@thinlink.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2016 10:10:40 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/45.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <1317364559.64256.1472791258452@privateemail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
DKIM_VALID, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,
RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM autolearn=no version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] New BIP: Dealing with dummy stack element
malleability
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2016 17:10:42 -0000
On 9/1/2016 9:40 PM, Johnson Lau via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> This BIP will be deployed by "version bits" BIP9 using the same parameters for BIP141 and BIP143, with the name "segwit" and using bit 1.
>
This fix has value outside of segwit. Why bundle the two together?
Shouldn't miners have to opportunity to vote on them independently?
|
