1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
|
Return-Path: <randi@codehalo.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5A5F0273
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sat, 27 Jun 2015 15:29:10 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from smtp81.iad3a.emailsrvr.com (smtp81.iad3a.emailsrvr.com
[173.203.187.81])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F316F2
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sat, 27 Jun 2015 15:29:09 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp19.relay.iad3a.emailsrvr.com (localhost.localdomain
[127.0.0.1])
by smtp19.relay.iad3a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id
646A21802D7; Sat, 27 Jun 2015 11:29:08 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by smtp19.relay.iad3a.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender:
randi-AT-codehalo.com) with ESMTPSA id 2EC26180284;
Sat, 27 Jun 2015 11:29:08 -0400 (EDT)
X-Sender-Id: randi@codehalo.com
Received: from Randis-MacBook-Pro.local (ool-44c253c0.dyn.optonline.net
[68.194.83.192]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA)
by 0.0.0.0:465 (trex/5.4.2); Sat, 27 Jun 2015 15:29:08 GMT
Message-ID: <558EC143.9000808@codehalo.com>
Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2015 11:29:07 -0400
From: Randi Joseph <randi@codehalo.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10;
rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org>, Michael Naber <mickeybob@gmail.com>,
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
References: <CALgxB7udA85BWetBGc-RN=72ZtVPK9Q5HW8YRDKA08M38XqJqQ@mail.gmail.com>
<1EF70EBC-8BB8-4A93-8591-52B2B0335F6C@petertodd.org>
In-Reply-To: <1EF70EBC-8BB8-4A93-8591-52B2B0335F6C@petertodd.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="------------040104050705020104010806"
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] A Proposed Compromise to the Block Size Limit
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2015 15:29:10 -0000
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------040104050705020104010806
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
I wish you were just as prudent when you were recommending full RBF to
mining pools.
On 6/27/15 11:21 AM, Peter Todd wrote:
> It's not a reasonable path forward right now given the lack of testing done with 8MB+ blocks, among many other problems. A way to help make that appear more reasonable would be to setup a 8MB testnet as I suggested, with two years or so of 8MB blocks in history as well as a large UTXO set to test performance characteristics.
--
Randi Joseph
--------------040104050705020104010806
Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">I wish you were just as prudent when
you were recommending full RBF to mining pools.<br>
<br>
On 6/27/15 11:21 AM, Peter Todd wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:1EF70EBC-8BB8-4A93-8591-52B2B0335F6C@petertodd.org"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">It's not a reasonable path forward right now given the lack of testing done with 8MB+ blocks, among many other problems. A way to help make that appear more reasonable would be to setup a 8MB testnet as I suggested, with two years or so of 8MB blocks in history as well as a large UTXO set to test performance characteristics.</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-signature">-- <br>
<div style="margin:8px 0; font-family:Verdana, sans-serif;
color:#555; font-size:13px; font-weight:bold">Randi Joseph</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>
--------------040104050705020104010806--
|
